What we got wrong, and what it says now.
Every published correction to a factual claim, statute citation, or figure on this site, newest first. Cosmetic edits are not logged. To report an error, email corrections@sidingquotesnearme.com with the page URL and the passage; our policy is on the editorial standards page.
Corrected a claim in "Board and Batten Siding Cost by Material: 2026 Price Breakdown"
Pages: Board and Batten Siding Cost by Material: 2026 Price Breakdown
Was: "Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page and compare real numbers for your material and style before you decide." Now: "Compare at least two of those quotes line by line for your material and style before you decide (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Repair Cost 2025: Prices for Small Fixes and Patches"
Pages: Siding Repair Cost 2025: Prices for Small Fixes and Patches
Was: "If you're not sure whether your situation calls for a quick patch or something bigger, get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. A quick on-site look is usually the fastest way to find out whether you're looking at a $200 fix or the start of a bigger conversation." Now: "If you're not sure whether your situation calls for a quick patch or something bigger, ask a local siding contractor to take a look. A quick on-site visit is usually the fastest way to find out whether you're looking at a $200 fix or the start of a bigger conversation (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl Siding Replacement in Minnesota: Costs & Cold-Climate Guide"
Pages: Vinyl Siding Replacement in Minnesota: Costs & Cold-Climate Guide
Was: "The most reliable way to land on the right product and a fair price is to get quotes from contractors who install siding in Minnesota year-round and know how local winters affect the work. Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page to compare options for your home." Now: "The most reliable way to land on the right product and a fair price is to get written quotes from two or three contractors who install siding in Minnesota year-round and know how local winters affect the work, then compare them line by line (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "James Hardie Siding in Minnesota: Cost, Cold-Climate Fit"
Pages: James Hardie Siding in Minnesota: Cost, Cold-Climate Fit
Was: "If you're comparing quotes or just trying to figure out whether James Hardie is worth the premium over vinyl for your specific home, get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. You can also check our siding glossary for terms like fiber cement and drip edge if a quote uses language you don't recognize." Now: "If you're comparing quotes or just trying to figure out whether James Hardie is worth the premium over vinyl for your specific home, ask local installers to quote both on the same scope and compare the bids line by line (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>). You can also check our <a href="/glossary">siding glossary</a> for terms like fiber cement and drip edge if a quote uses language you don't recognize." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Installation Cost in Minnesota: 2026 Price Guide"
Pages: Siding Installation Cost in Minnesota: 2026 Price Guide
Was: "Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page to compare quotes without having to cold-call companies yourself." Now: "Compare at least two of those written quotes line by line, and verify each license with the state before you sign (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Engineered Wood Siding Cost: Full Project Total for 2025"
Pages: Engineered Wood Siding Cost: Full Project Total for 2025
Was: "Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page to get a free, itemized quote for your specific home and siding choice." Now: "Ask two or three local contractors for written, itemized quotes for your specific home and siding choice, and compare them line by line (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Engineered Wood Siding Cost Per Square Foot: What Drives Price"
Pages: Engineered Wood Siding Cost Per Square Foot: What Drives Price
Was: "Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page, and ask for a written, itemized per-square-foot breakdown before you sign anything." Now: "Ask each local contractor you talk to for a written, itemized per-square-foot breakdown before you sign anything, and compare at least two of them side by side (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Board and Batten Siding: Look, Style Fit, and Pros & Cons"
Pages: Board and Batten Siding: Look, Style Fit, and Pros & Cons
Was: "A local siding contractor who has installed the style on homes similar to yours is worth more here than any online rendering tool, since they can tell you honestly whether your specific facade will support the look. Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page to get a few opinions and quotes before you commit to a design." Now: "A local siding contractor who has installed the style on homes similar to yours is worth more here than any online rendering tool, since they can tell you honestly whether your specific facade will support the look. Ask two or three of them for opinions and written quotes before you commit to a design (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Mobile Home Siding Cost: 2025 Prices & Material Guide"
Pages: Mobile Home Siding Cost: 2025 Prices & Material Guide
Was: "Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page to compare quotes from siding pros who work on manufactured homes in your area." Now: "Get written quotes from two or three siding contractors who work on manufactured homes in your area, and compare them line by line (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide"
Pages: Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide
Was: "Either way, the installation quality matters as much as the product. An excellent installer using a mid-range product will outperform a careless installer using a premium one. Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page." Now: "Either way, the installation quality matters as much as the product. An excellent installer using a mid-range product will outperform a careless installer using a premium one. Get written quotes from two or three installers who work through Minnesota winters, and verify each one's license with the state before you sign (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Metal Siding Cost: Price Per Sq Ft & Is It Worth It?"
Pages: Metal Siding Cost: Price Per Sq Ft & Is It Worth It?
Was: "Ready to explore metal siding for your home? Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page — it's free, and there's no obligation." Now: "Ready to explore metal siding for your home? Ask two or three local contractors who install metal siding for written quotes, and check license and insurance before you sign (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Financing: Payment Options, Loans & Tips"
Pages: Siding Replacement Financing: Payment Options, Loans & Tips
Was: "No matter which path you choose, the first step is knowing what the project will cost in your area. Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page to collect free, no-obligation estimates and make an informed financing decision." Now: "No matter which path you choose, the first step is knowing what the project will cost in your area. Start with our <a href="/tools">cost tools</a>, then collect written estimates from two or three local contractors so your financing decision rests on real numbers." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared"
Pages: Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared
Was: "Ready to see what each option would cost on your home? Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. You'll receive quotes from local installers who work with both vinyl and fiber cement, so you can compare real numbers — not just estimates from the internet." Now: "Ready to see what each option would cost on your home? Ask installers who work with both vinyl and fiber cement to quote each one on the same scope, so you can compare real numbers rather than estimates from the internet (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Contractors Minnesota: Costs, Licenses & Tips"
Pages: Siding Contractors Minnesota: Costs, Licenses & Tips
Was: "Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. You can also compare material options in our siding materials guide or check unfamiliar terms in our siding glossary." Now: "Get written quotes from two or three Minnesota contractors and verify each license with the state before you sign (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>). You can also compare material options in our <a href="/articles/siding-materials-compared">siding materials guide</a> or check unfamiliar terms in our <a href="/glossary">siding glossary</a>." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "When to Replace Vinyl Siding: Signs It's Time for New Siding"
Pages: When to Replace Vinyl Siding: Signs It's Time for New Siding
Was: "Ready to find out what replacement would cost for your home? Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. You'll receive estimates from local siding contractors in your area, with no obligation and no pressure." Now: "Ready to find out what replacement would cost for your home? Start with our <a href="/tools">cost tools</a>, then get written estimates from two or three local siding contractors and compare them line by line." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does Vinyl Siding Cost? Local Price Ranges Explained"
Pages: How Much Does Vinyl Siding Cost? Local Price Ranges Explained
Was: "If you're ready to find out exactly what vinyl siding would cost for your home, get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. You'll receive quotes from local installers in your area, with no obligation." Now: "If you're ready to find out exactly what vinyl siding would cost for your home, get written quotes from two or three local installers and compare them line by line, using our <a href="/tools">cost tools</a> as a sanity check on the totals." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Should New Siding Cost? 2024 Price Guide"
Pages: How Much Should New Siding Cost? 2024 Price Guide
Was: "A qualified contractor can inspect your siding and give you an honest assessment. Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page to request free, no-obligation estimates from local contractors in your area." Now: "A qualified contractor can inspect your siding and give you an honest assessment. Get written, itemized estimates from two or three local contractors and compare them against the ranges above (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Cost to Replace Siding on One Side of House (2024)"
Pages: Cost to Replace Siding on One Side of House (2024)
Was: "If you're ready to compare prices from local siding contractors in your area, get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. You'll receive free, no-obligation quotes tailored to your specific wall and material preference." Now: "If you're ready to compare prices, ask two or three local siding contractors for written quotes on the one wall, with the material and prep work itemized, and compare them line by line (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered"
Pages: Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered
Was: "Whether you're filing a claim or paying out of pocket, getting accurate estimates from qualified contractors is the essential first step. Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page to compare quotes and understand your options before making any decisions." Now: "Whether you're filing a claim or paying out of pocket, getting accurate estimates from qualified contractors is the essential first step. Collect written quotes from two or three local contractors and compare them against the adjuster's scope before making any decisions (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Best Time to Replace Siding: A Season-by-Season Guide"
Pages: Best Time to Replace Siding: A Season-by-Season Guide
Was: "Whether you're planning months ahead or dealing with an urgent situation, the right contractor makes all the difference. Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page — we connect you with local siding professionals in your area who can advise on the best timing for your specific project and climate." Now: "Whether you're planning months ahead or dealing with an urgent situation, the right contractor makes all the difference. Ask local siding contractors how their schedule and pricing change by season, get written quotes from at least two, and confirm license and insurance before you sign (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Is the Upgrade Worth It?"
Pages: Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Is the Upgrade Worth It?
Was: "Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page — we'll connect you with local siding contractors who can quote both options side by side." Now: "Ask two or three local siding contractors to quote both options side by side on the same scope, and compare the bids line by line (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Cost to Reside 1500 Sq Ft House: 2024 Ranch Prices"
Pages: Cost to Reside 1500 Sq Ft House: 2024 Ranch Prices
Was: "Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. Ask any contractor you are matched with for proof of licensing and insurance before you sign." Now: "Get written, itemized quotes from two or three local contractors and compare them line by line. Ask each one for proof of licensing and insurance before you sign (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Mold on Siding: How to Clean & Prevent Green Streaks"
Pages: Mold on Siding: How to Clean & Prevent Green Streaks
Was: "If the mold keeps returning or you're seeing signs of damage underneath, it may be time to talk with a siding professional. Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page." Now: "If the mold keeps returning or you're seeing signs of damage underneath, it may be time to have a local siding contractor inspect the wall and put their findings in writing (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Tree Branches Siding Damage: How to Prevent Cracks & Rot"
Pages: Tree Branches Siding Damage: How to Prevent Cracks & Rot
Was: "Need help evaluating your siding's condition or getting repair and replacement estimates? Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page." Now: "Need help evaluating your siding's condition or getting repair and replacement estimates? Ask a local siding contractor for a written assessment, and get a second quote before you commit to anything larger than a small repair (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "When you're ready to explore pricing for your specific home, get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. We connect you with local siding professionals in your area who can provide detailed quotes based on your home's size, current condition, and material preferences." Now: "When you're ready to explore pricing for your specific home, ask two or three local siding contractors for detailed written quotes based on your home's size, current condition, and material preferences, and compare them line by line (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Caulk Around Windows & Doors: Stop Water Damage"
Pages: Siding Caulk Around Windows & Doors: Stop Water Damage
Was: "If you're noticing signs of water intrusion around your windows, doors, or trim and want a professional assessment, get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. A qualified siding contractor can pinpoint where water is entering and recommend whether you need simple caulk repair, trim replacement, or a more comprehensive fix." Now: "If you're noticing signs of water intrusion around your windows, doors, or trim and want a professional assessment, have a local siding contractor inspect the wall. A qualified siding contractor can pinpoint where water is entering and recommend whether you need simple caulk repair, trim replacement, or a more comprehensive fix (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does It Cost to Reside a Two-Story House? (2025)"
Pages: How Much Does It Cost to Reside a Two-Story House? (2025)
Was: "If you're ready to start collecting quotes, get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. We connect you with local siding installers in your area at no cost to you." Now: "If you're ready to start collecting quotes, ask two or three local siding installers for written, itemized bids on the same scope, and check each one's license and insurance before you sign (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Cost, Energy Savings & Worth"
Pages: Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Cost, Energy Savings & Worth
Was: "Whether you choose insulated or standard panels, the quality of the installation matters more than the product itself. Poorly installed insulated siding can perform worse than well-installed standard siding. Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page to compare quotes from local installers in your area who can assess your specific walls and recommend the right approach." Now: "Whether you choose insulated or standard panels, the quality of the installation matters more than the product itself. Poorly installed insulated siding can perform worse than well-installed standard siding. Ask local installers who can assess your specific walls to quote both options side by side, and compare the bids line by line (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?"
Pages: Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?
Was: "If you're considering new siding or need an honest evaluation of what you have, get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. You'll receive quotes from local professionals in your area who can evaluate your siding's condition and walk you through your options." Now: "If you're considering new siding or need an honest evaluation of what you have, ask a local siding contractor to inspect it and put their findings and pricing in writing, then get a second opinion before you commit (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Hail Damage Siding: Insurance Claim & Replacement Guide"
Pages: Hail Damage Siding: Insurance Claim & Replacement Guide
Was: "If you're ready to start the process, get matched with a local contractor experienced in insurance restoration work by using the form on our home page. A qualified contractor can inspect your damage, provide a detailed estimate, and coordinate directly with your adjuster to help ensure your claim reflects the true cost of replacement." Now: "If you're ready to start the process, look for a local contractor experienced in insurance restoration work and get their estimate in writing. A qualified contractor can inspect your damage, provide a detailed estimate, and coordinate directly with your adjuster to help ensure your claim reflects the true cost of replacement (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. We connect you with local siding professionals who can assess your home, recommend materials that fit your budget and neighborhood, and provide a detailed written estimate." Now: "Ask two or three local siding contractors to assess your home, recommend materials that fit your budget and neighborhood, and provide a detailed written estimate, then compare those estimates line by line (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices"
Pages: Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices
Was: "Get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page and we'll send you quotes from local pros in your area." Now: "To price your own house, run the numbers in our <a href="/tools">cost tools</a>, then get written, itemized quotes from two or three local contractors and compare them line by line." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "James Hardie vs LP SmartSide: An Honest Comparison"
Pages: James Hardie vs LP SmartSide: An Honest Comparison
Was: "If you're ready to get real pricing for your home, get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page. You'll receive quotes from local installers who are experienced with both products and can help you make the right call for your climate, budget, and home style." Now: "If you're ready to get real pricing for your home, ask two or three local installers who work with both products for written quotes, and compare them line by line. Check each one's license and insurance first (<a href="/how-we-screen-contractors">what to verify before you sign</a>)." Why: The site no longer takes quote requests or matches homeowners with contractors; the call to use our form was replaced with advice on collecting and comparing quotes yourself.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl Siding Replacement in Minnesota: Costs & Cold-Climate Guide"
Pages: Vinyl Siding Replacement in Minnesota: Costs & Cold-Climate Guide
Was: "specifies that fastener clearance and receiving-channel gaps (at corner posts and J-channel) need to be increased to about 3/8 inch when installing at or below 40°F, compared with a much smaller clearance in warmer conditions." Now: "specifies that the clearance left at openings and receiving channels (corner posts and J-channel) be increased from the usual minimum of 1/4 inch to 3/8 inch when installing below 40°F. (The institute has been called the Polymeric Exterior Products Association since 2024.)" Why: The VSI manual calls for a 1/4 inch minimum clearance at openings and stops, increased to 3/8 inch below 40°F; it does not increase fastener clearance (fastener heads stay about 1/32 inch off the panel), and the Vinyl Siding Institute renamed itself the Polymeric Exterior Products Association in May 2024. Sources: VSI Vinyl Siding Installation Manual (2020 edition); Plastics News: vinyl siding trade group changes name; VSI/PEPA name change press release.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl Siding Replacement in Minnesota: Costs & Cold-Climate Guide"
Pages: Vinyl Siding Replacement in Minnesota: Costs & Cold-Climate Guide
Was: "vinyl doesn't typically start losing flexibility and becoming brittle until it's exposed to well-below-zero temperatures for extended stretches, which is exactly the kind of cold snap Minnesota gets most winters" Now: "vinyl starts losing flexibility and becoming brittle once temperatures drop well below freezing, and the risk is highest during the extended sub-zero cold snaps Minnesota gets most winters" Why: Cold-climate sources put the brittleness threshold below freezing or below roughly 20°F, not 'well below zero'; the original understates the risk and conflicts with the site's James Hardie article. Sources: Twin Cities Siding Professionals: fiber cement vs vinyl in cold weather; Craftsman Exteriors: fiber cement vs vinyl (brittle below 20°F).
Corrected a claim in "James Hardie Siding in Minnesota: Cost, Cold-Climate Fit"
Pages: James Hardie Siding in Minnesota: Cost, Cold-Climate Fit
Was: "<td>Becomes brittle below about -10°F</td>" Now: "<td>Becomes brittle in sub-freezing cold</td>" Why: Same issue as the body text: no source supports a -10°F brittleness threshold; the cited source says below freezing. Sources: Twin Cities Siding Professionals: fiber cement vs vinyl in cold weather; Craftsman Exteriors: fiber cement vs vinyl (brittle below 20°F).
Corrected a claim in "James Hardie Siding in Minnesota: Cost, Cold-Climate Fit"
Pages: James Hardie Siding in Minnesota: Cost, Cold-Climate Fit
Was: "Standard vinyl becomes brittle below roughly -10°F, and in a real Minnesota cold snap" Now: "Standard vinyl becomes noticeably more brittle once temperatures fall below freezing, and in a real Minnesota cold snap" Why: The cited Twin Cities Siding Professionals article says vinyl becomes brittle in below-freezing temperatures and never gives a -10°F threshold; other cold-climate comparisons cite below 20°F, so the -10°F figure is unsupported and misattributed. Sources: Twin Cities Siding Professionals: fiber cement vs vinyl in cold weather; Craftsman Exteriors: fiber cement vs vinyl (brittle below 20°F).
Corrected a claim in "Siding Installation Cost in Minnesota: 2026 Price Guide"
Pages: Siding Installation Cost in Minnesota: 2026 Price Guide
Was: "installation labor alone typically runs $2 to $12 per square foot" Now: "installation labor alone typically runs $1.50 to $5 per square foot" Why: A $12 per square foot labor-only figure is outside every source checked: Forbes Home gives $1.50-$4.50 for siding labor and $2-$5 for vinyl, and Craftsmen's Minnesota guide gives $3-$5. Sources: Forbes Home siding cost guide; Forbes Home vinyl siding cost guide; Craftsmen Home Improvements Minnesota siding cost.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Installation Cost in Minnesota: 2026 Price Guide"
Pages: Siding Installation Cost in Minnesota: 2026 Price Guide
Was: "The Midwest, including Minnesota, generally runs 10 to 20 percent below the national average, though the cold-climate material upgrades and short installation season common here can eat into some of that discount." Now: "The Midwest, including Minnesota, generally runs at or somewhat below the national average, though the cold-climate material upgrades and short installation season common here can erase much of that difference." Why: No source supports a 10-20 percent Midwest discount; regional cost guides put the Midwest at roughly the national average to slightly below, and Angi's Minneapolis vinyl average of $15,201 is not below national norms. Sources: Home Genius Exteriors vinyl siding cost guide (regional labor rates); GM Exteriors Illinois siding cost guide; Angi Minneapolis vinyl siding cost.
Corrected a claim in "Engineered Wood Siding Cost: Full Project Total for 2025"
Pages: Engineered Wood Siding Cost: Full Project Total for 2025
Was: "installed pricing for the siding itself (materials and labor combined) runs roughly $7 to $12 per square foot, with some jobs landing as low as $4 per square foot for simple ranch-style homes and as high as $13 to $14 per square foot for complex rooflines, extensive trim work, or premium finishes." Now: "installed pricing for the siding itself (materials and labor combined) runs roughly $4 to $13 per square foot and averages about $8.50, with simple ranch-style homes at the low end and complex rooflines, extensive trim work, or premium finishes at the high end. HomeGuide puts the typical installed range a bit tighter, at $7 to $12 per square foot." Why: The $7-$12 range and the $13-$14 high end are not what Angi publishes; Angi's guide states $4 to $13 per square foot with an $8.50 average, while $7 to $12 is HomeGuide's figure. Sources: Angi engineered wood siding cost guide; HomeGuide wood siding cost guide.
Corrected a claim in "Engineered Wood Siding Cost: Full Project Total for 2025"
Pages: Engineered Wood Siding Cost: Full Project Total for 2025
Was: "typically totals $11,000 to $22,000 for a 1,500 square foot home and $19,000 to $36,000 for a 2,500 square foot home in 2025" Now: "typically totals about $13,000 to $25,000 for a 1,500 square foot home and $21,000 to $40,000 for a 2,500 square foot home" Why: The intro totals contradict the article's own itemized table ($12,900-$25,100 and $20,850-$40,450); the table is built on Angi's $4-$13 per sq ft installed range plus removal, permits, trim, and paint, so the intro should match it. Sources: Angi engineered wood siding cost guide; HomeGuide siding cost guide.
Corrected a claim in "Engineered Wood Siding Cost Per Square Foot: What Drives Price"
Pages: Engineered Wood Siding Cost Per Square Foot: What Drives Price
Was: "<td>LP SmartSide lap, factory prefinished (ColorPlus/ExpertFinish)</td>" Now: "<td>LP SmartSide lap, factory prefinished (ExpertFinish)</td>" Why: ColorPlus is James Hardie's fiber cement finish and is not available on LP SmartSide; LP's factory-finished line is ExpertFinish. Sources: LP: Introducing LP SmartSide ExpertFinish; James Hardie: Hardie Panel Siding (ColorPlus Technology).
Corrected a claim in "Engineered Wood Siding Cost Per Square Foot: What Drives Price"
Pages: Engineered Wood Siding Cost Per Square Foot: What Drives Price
Was: "Factory-applied finish (LP's ColorPlus and ExpertFinish lines are the best-known examples) typically adds roughly <strong>$1.75 to $3.15 per square foot</strong> over primed siding that still needs field paint, based on manufacturer dealer cost comparisons." Now: "Factory-applied finish (LP's ExpertFinish line is the best-known example for engineered wood; ColorPlus is James Hardie's equivalent for fiber cement) typically adds roughly <strong>$1 to $2.50 per square foot</strong> over primed siding that still needs field paint, based on published cost guides." Why: ColorPlus Technology is James Hardie's factory finish, not LP's, and published cost guides put the ExpertFinish premium at about $0.50 to $2.50 per square foot; nothing supports the $1.75 to $3.15 figure or the 'manufacturer dealer cost comparisons' attribution. Sources: LP: Introducing LP SmartSide ExpertFinish; James Hardie: Hardie Panel Siding (ColorPlus Technology); My Discount Roof: LP SmartSide cost guide (ExpertFinish premium); Urban Exteriors: Cost of LP SmartSide (ExpertFinish upcharge).
Corrected a claim in "Siding Storm Damage: A Step-by-Step Homeowner Guide"
Pages: Siding Storm Damage: A Step-by-Step Homeowner Guide
Was: "get matched with a local, pre-screened contractor using the form on our home page" Now: "get matched with a local contractor using the form on our home page" Why: The site's own screening page says homeowner requests are routed to a lead partner's network and contractors are not onboarded or screened directly, so 'pre-screened' is unsupported and breaks the editorial rule against describing contractors as pre-screened. Sources: Siding Quotes Near Me: How We Screen Contractors.
Corrected a claim in "Board and Batten Siding: Look, Style Fit, and Pros & Cons"
Pages: Board and Batten Siding: Look, Style Fit, and Pros & Cons
Was: "according to <a href="https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes472061.htm">Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment data for construction trades (SOC 47-2061, sheet metal workers and related siding trades)</a>" Now: "a spread in line with regional wage differences in <a href="https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes472061.htm">Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics for construction laborers (SOC 47-2061)</a>" Why: SOC 47-2061 is Construction Laborers, not sheet metal workers, and BLS publishes regional wages rather than siding labor-rate comparisons, so the code label and the 'according to' framing were both wrong. Sources: BLS OES 47-2061 Construction Laborers; BLS May 2025 OEWS occupation list.
Corrected a claim in "Board and Batten Siding: Look, Style Fit, and Pros & Cons"
Pages: Board and Batten Siding: Look, Style Fit, and Pros & Cons
Was: "Here is a breakdown by common material, with costs drawn from published manufacturer documentation and <a href="https://www.nahb.org/news-and-economics/housing-economics/priced-out">NAHB housing affordability research</a> on residential construction labor and material trends:" Now: "Here is a breakdown by common material, with typical installed ranges drawn from published manufacturer documentation and national cost guides:" Why: NAHB's Priced Out research measures how many households are priced out of a median new home by price and rate changes; it contains no siding labor or material cost data, so the attribution was wrong. Sources: NAHB Priced Out special study (March 2025); NAHB: Households Priced Out by Higher House Prices and Interest Rates.
Corrected a claim in "Board and Batten Siding: Look, Style Fit, and Pros & Cons"
Pages: Board and Batten Siding: Look, Style Fit, and Pros & Cons
Was: "Installed board and batten siding typically runs about $5 to $13 per square foot, with total project costs commonly landing between roughly $8,500 and $27,300 for a full-size home" Now: "Installed board and batten siding typically runs about $2.50 to $12.50 per square foot, with total project costs commonly landing between roughly $8,500 and $27,300 for a full-size home" Why: The sentence attributes the figure to HomeAdvisor, whose board and batten page gives $2.50 to $12.50 per square foot installed (and $8,500 to $27,300 total), not $5 to $13. Sources: HomeAdvisor: Board and Batten Siding Cost.
Corrected a claim in "Mobile Home Siding Cost: 2025 Prices & Material Guide"
Pages: Mobile Home Siding Cost: 2025 Prices & Material Guide
Was: "That extra care adds time and, in many markets, a skill premium of roughly <strong>10–15 percent</strong> over a comparable site-built job, according to installer pricing guidance published by the <a href="https://www.vinylsiding.org/installation/">Vinyl Siding Institute</a>." Now: "That extra care adds time and, in many markets, a labor premium of roughly <strong>10 to 15 percent</strong> over a comparable site-built job. Treat that premium as a typical estimate rather than a published figure; the <a href="https://www.vinylsiding.org/installation/">Vinyl Siding Institute</a> publishes an installation manual and installer certification program, not pricing guidance." Why: The Vinyl Siding Institute publishes installation standards (based on ASTM D4756) and a certified installer program but no installer pricing guidance, so the 10-15 percent premium was misattributed. Sources: VSI Vinyl Siding Installation Manual; VSI Certified Installer Program Guidelines.
Corrected a claim in "Mobile Home Siding Cost: 2025 Prices & Material Guide"
Pages: Mobile Home Siding Cost: 2025 Prices & Material Guide
Was: "often use 2x2 or 2x3 wood framing or light-gauge metal studs, installers must locate those framing members carefully before driving fasteners. Hitting a stud in a 1.5-inch-deep wall cavity leaves far less margin for error than in a 2x4 stick-built wall" Now: "often use 2x3 or 2x4 wood framing behind thin sheathing, installers must locate those framing members carefully before driving fasteners. Hitting a narrow stud behind thin sheathing leaves less margin for error than in a 2x4 or 2x6 stick-built wall" Why: Sources describe 2x3 or 2x4 (sometimes 2x6) exterior studs in HUD Code homes, not 2x2 or metal studs, and a 1.5-inch cavity only follows from 2x2 framing, which the sources do not support. Sources: How to Look at a House (inspector blog): stud sizes in manufactured homes; Clayton Homes: manufactured home wall materials.
Corrected a claim in "Mobile Home Siding Cost: 2025 Prices & Material Guide"
Pages: Mobile Home Siding Cost: 2025 Prices & Material Guide
Was: "Many mobile homes use thinner exterior sheathing and metal studs or 2x2/2x3 framing rather than the 2x4 or 2x6 studs common in stick-built houses, which limits how much weight the wall can carry and how fasteners need to be driven." Now: "Many mobile homes, especially older ones, use thinner exterior sheathing and 2x3 framing (newer manufactured homes are most often 2x4, with 2x6 in some wind and thermal zones) rather than the full-depth 2x4 or 2x6 walls typical of stick-built houses, which limits how much weight the wall can carry and how fasteners need to be driven." Why: Inspector and manufacturer sources say manufactured-home exterior walls are most often 2x4 and sometimes 2x3 or 2x6; 2x2 framing and metal studs are not typical, so the original overstates how light the framing is. Sources: How to Look at a House (inspector blog): stud sizes in manufactured homes; Clayton Homes: manufactured home wall materials; Mobile Home Friend: stud sizes.
Corrected a claim in "Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide"
Pages: Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide
Was: "<td>Marginal (product-dependent)</td>" Now: "Partly (about R-2 to R-5)" Why: With the Zone 5 column removed, insulated vinyl's foam backing contributes R-2 to R-4 toward the R-5 continuous insulation target but does not meet it alone. Sources: Minnesota DLI: 2020 residential energy code fact sheet (climate zones, wall R-values).
Corrected a claim in "Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide"
Pages: Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide
Was: "<th>Meets Zone 5 R-3.8 requirement?</th>" Now: "<th>Counts toward the R-5 ci target?</th>" Why: Minnesota has no Zone 5 and the residential code has no R-3.8 ci requirement, so the column is relabeled to show whether each option contributes continuous insulation toward the Zone 6 and 7 R-5 target. Sources: Minnesota DLI: 2020 residential energy code fact sheet (climate zones, wall R-values).
Corrected a claim in "Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide"
Pages: Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide
Was: "Under that code, most of Minnesota falls in Climate Zone 6 (the northern half of the state) or Climate Zone 5 (the Twin Cities metro and southern counties). Zone 6 requires a minimum of <strong>R-5 continuous insulation</strong> on above-grade walls with 2x4 framing, and Zone 5 requires R-3.8 continuous insulation under the same framing condition, per Table R402.1.3 of the IECC." Now: "Under that code, all of Minnesota falls in Climate Zone 6 (including the Twin Cities metro and the southern counties) or Climate Zone 7 (the northern counties). Zone 6 calls for a wood-framed wall with R-20 cavity insulation, or R-13 cavity insulation plus R-5 continuous insulation, and Zone 7 calls for more (R-20 plus R-5 continuous, or R-13 plus R-10, under the model code); for a 2x4 wall that means at least R-5 of foam over the sheathing." Why: No part of Minnesota is in IECC Climate Zone 5: the IECC county table puts Hennepin, Ramsey and all southern counties in Zone 6A and the northern tier in Zone 7, and the residential wall requirement in both zones is R-20 or R-13 plus R-5 ci; the R-3.8 ci figure comes from the commercial wall table, not the residential code. Sources: Minnesota DLI: 2020 residential energy code fact sheet (climate zones, wall R-values); IECC chapter 3, Table R301.1 climate zones by county.
Corrected a claim in "Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide"
Pages: Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide
Was: "Minnesota Energy Code (MEC), which is based on the 2020 IECC</a>." Now: "Minnesota Energy Code (MEC), whose residential chapter is currently based on the 2012 IECC</a>." Why: There is no 2020 IECC; Minnesota's residential energy code (Minn. Rules ch. 1322) is based on the 2012 IECC, with a 2024-based update in rulemaking as of 2026. Sources: Minnesota DLI rulemaking docket, Minnesota Rules chapter 1322; Minnesota DLI: 2020 residential energy code fact sheet.
Corrected a claim in "Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide"
Pages: Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide
Was: "homeowners can claim <strong>30 percent of insulation material costs</strong>, not labor, up to a <strong>$1,200 annual cap</strong>. Only the rigid foam sheathing and other qualifying insulation materials count toward this credit, not the siding itself. Consult a tax professional to confirm eligibility for your specific project before filing." Now: "homeowners could claim <strong>30 percent of insulation material costs</strong>, not labor, up to a <strong>$1,200 annual cap</strong> for work completed by the end of 2025. Only rigid foam sheathing and other qualifying insulation materials counted, not the siding itself. Consult a tax professional before assuming any federal credit applies to a 2026 project." Why: The 30 percent and $1,200 terms were correct for tax years 2023 through 2025, but the credit no longer applies to property placed in service after December 31, 2025, so the present-tense eligibility language is out of date. Sources: IRS: Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit; Instead: What section 70505 ended for the 25C home energy credit.
Corrected a claim in "Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide"
Pages: Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide
Was: "Adding qualifying insulation materials during that process may also make you eligible for the federal <strong>Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit</strong>: under" Now: "Adding qualifying insulation materials during that process used to qualify for the federal <strong>Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit</strong>, but that credit ended for improvements placed in service after December 31, 2025: under" Why: Section 70505 of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (July 2025) terminated the Section 25C credit for property placed in service after December 31, 2025, so a 2026 re-side cannot claim it. Sources: IRS: Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit; Instead: What section 70505 ended for the 25C home energy credit.
Corrected a claim in "Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide"
Pages: Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide
Was: "Minnesota allows some variation in local adoption cycles. Some counties and municipalities have not yet enforced the full 2020 IECC update and may still be operating under 2015 cycle requirements, which carry a slightly different ci table. Before budgeting for insulation upgrades, confirm with your local building department which code cycle governs your permit." Now: "The Minnesota State Building Code, including the energy code, is uniform statewide under Minn. Stat. 326B.121, so the insulation requirements do not change from county to county; what varies locally is whether the code is enforced and whether a re-side needs a permit and inspection. Before budgeting for insulation upgrades, confirm with your local building department what your permit will require." Why: Minnesota never adopted a 2015 or 2020 IECC (its residential energy code has been based on the 2012 IECC since 2015), and Minn. Stat. 326B.121 makes the State Building Code apply statewide and supersede local codes, so there are no county-level code cycles with different ci tables. Sources: Minnesota DLI rulemaking docket, Minnesota Rules chapter 1322; Minn. Stat. 326B.121 State Building Code applies statewide.
Corrected a claim in "Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide"
Pages: Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide
Was: "Most of Minnesota falls in <strong>Climate Zone 6</strong> under the 2020 International Energy Conservation Code, which Minnesota adopted as the basis for the" Now: "Most of Minnesota falls in Climate Zone 6 (the northern counties are Zone 7) under the International Energy Conservation Code. The 2012 IECC, adopted in 2015 and now in the process of being updated, is the current basis for the" Why: There is no 2020 IECC (editions are 2012, 2015, 2018, 2021 and 2024); Minnesota's residential energy code (Minn. Rules ch. 1322) has been based on the 2012 IECC since 2015, and DLI opened rulemaking in February 2026 to adopt a code based on 2024 IRC chapter 11, expected to take effect in late 2026 or 2027. Sources: Minnesota DLI rulemaking docket, Minnesota Rules chapter 1322; Minnesota DLI residential energy TAG proposals (2024 IRC ch. 11).
Corrected a claim in "Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide"
Pages: Best Siding for Minnesota Winters: A Homeowner's Guide
Was: "State law requires a residential building contractor license for this work." Now: "State law (Minn. Stat. 326B.805) requires a residential building contractor or remodeler license for companies that offer two or more building skills, though a firm that performs only one skill is exempt." Why: Minn. Stat. 326B.805 subd. 6 exempts a specialty contractor who provides only one special skill, so a siding-only company is not required to hold the license; the flat statement was overbroad. Sources: Minn. Stat. 326B.805 Licensing requirements; Minnesota DLI: residential building contractor license exemptions.
Corrected a claim in "Metal Siding Cost: Price Per Sq Ft & Is It Worth It?"
Pages: Metal Siding Cost: Price Per Sq Ft & Is It Worth It?
Was: "but installer surveys and appraiser guidance generally place metal siding's resale recoup in the <strong>65–80% range</strong> — slightly behind fiber cement, primarily because buyers in many markets are less familiar with it" Now: "so there is no reliable national figure; metal siding is generally expected to recoup <strong>somewhat less than fiber cement</strong>, primarily because buyers in many markets are less familiar with it" Why: No installer survey or appraiser guidance supports a 65-80% figure, and the site holds no survey data, so the sentence presented an unsourced estimate as sourced data. Sources: JLC / Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (no metal siding category).
Corrected a claim in "Metal Siding Cost: Price Per Sq Ft & Is It Worth It?"
Pages: Metal Siding Cost: Price Per Sq Ft & Is It Worth It?
Was: "steel has a recycling rate above 90% in North America" Now: "the overall U.S. steel recycling rate is roughly 70%, and rates for cars and appliances exceed 90%" Why: AISI/SRI reporting puts the overall U.S. steel recycling rate at about 69-71% (three- and ten-year averages), with 90%+ rates only for specific streams such as automobiles and appliances. Sources: AISI and SMA Steel Recycling Rates Report (2021); AISI Recycling.
Corrected a claim in "Metal Siding Cost: Price Per Sq Ft & Is It Worth It?"
Pages: Metal Siding Cost: Price Per Sq Ft & Is It Worth It?
Was: "siding replacements typically recoup <strong>60–80% of their cost</strong> at resale, according to Remodeling Magazine" Now: "siding replacements typically recoup <strong>roughly 80% to 88% of their cost</strong> at resale, according to Remodeling Magazine's 2024 Cost vs. Value Report" Why: The 2024 report shows 80.2% for vinyl and 88.4% for fiber cement (the 2025 report is higher still), so 60-80% understates the published figures it is attributed to. Sources: JLC / Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; Foundry Siding summary of 2024 Cost vs. Value (vinyl 80%, stone veneer 153%).
Corrected a claim in "Metal Siding Cost: Price Per Sq Ft & Is It Worth It?"
Pages: Metal Siding Cost: Price Per Sq Ft & Is It Worth It?
Was: "averages around $21,000–$24,000 nationally" Now: "averages around $20,600 nationally" Why: The 2024 Cost vs. Value report the sentence cites lists a national fiber-cement siding replacement job cost of $20,619, which is below the stated $21,000-$24,000 range (and matches the article's own table further down). Sources: JLC / Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Financing: Payment Options, Loans & Tips"
Pages: Siding Replacement Financing: Payment Options, Loans & Tips
Was: "<td>~$295</td><td>~$9,800+</td><td>~$24,800+</td>" Now: "<td>~$351</td><td>~$14,500+</td><td>~$29,500+</td>" Why: The row's own inputs ($15,000 at 22% APR over 7 years) amortize to about $351 per month, about $14,500 in interest and about $29,500 total; the printed $295/$9,800 figures imply roughly 15.7% APR and understate the cost of the deferred-interest scenario. Sources: Standard loan amortization formula (recomputed: 15000*r/(1-(1+r)^-84), r=0.22/12).
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Financing: Payment Options, Loans & Tips"
Pages: Siding Replacement Financing: Payment Options, Loans & Tips
Was: "The average per-home investment is roughly <strong>$8,009</strong> per the" Now: "DOE caps the average investment per home at roughly $8,000 to $9,000, adjusted each program year, per the" Why: $8,009 was DOE's maximum average cost per dwelling unit for program year 2022 only ($7,776 in 2021, $8,250 in 2023, adjusted annually by CPI up to 3%), so it is neither current nor an average spend. Sources: DOE WAP: Average Cost Per Dwelling Unit.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Financing: Payment Options, Loans & Tips"
Pages: Siding Replacement Financing: Payment Options, Loans & Tips
Was: "The federal Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 expanded some home-efficiency tax credits, though siding alone typically doesn't qualify unless it's part of a broader insulation or weatherization project." Now: "The federal Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit expanded by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 ended for property placed in service after December 31, 2025, and siding alone never qualified on its own, so any current help will come from state or utility programs rather than federal tax credits." Why: The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21, July 2025) terminated the Section 25C credit for property placed in service after Dec 31, 2025, per the IRS and ENERGY STAR credit pages, so the article's framing is out of date as of 2026. Sources: IRS: Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit; ENERGY STAR: Federal Tax Credits for Energy Efficiency; Alliance to Save Energy: IRS guidance on 25C termination.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared"
Pages: Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared
Was: "Because fiber cement is classified as noncombustible under <a href="https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IBC2021P1/chapter-14-exterior-walls" rel="nofollow">IBC Chapter 14</a>," Now: "Because fiber cement is classified as noncombustible when tested to ASTM E136, the standard the <a href="https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IBC2021P1/chapter-14-exterior-walls" rel="nofollow">International Building Code</a> uses to define noncombustible materials," Why: The IBC defines noncombustible materials by ASTM E136 testing (Section 703), not in Chapter 14; ICC-ES evaluation report ESR-2290 lists James Hardie siding as noncombustible per ASTM E136. Source read via search excerpts only. Sources: ICC-ES ESR-2290: James Hardie Building Products.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared"
Pages: Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared
Was: "fiber cement siding replacement recoups about 88.5% of project cost at resale, compared to roughly 80.2% for vinyl siding replacement" Now: "fiber cement siding replacement recoups about 88.4% of project cost at resale, compared to roughly 80.2% for vinyl siding replacement" Why: The 2024 figure is 88.4% ($18,230 resale on $20,619 cost), which is what the article's own tables show; 88.5% was the 2023 report's fiber cement figure. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared"
Pages: Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared
Was: "recouping roughly 88% of project cost versus about 80% for vinyl, according to the most recent national remodeling data." Now: "recouping roughly 88% of project cost versus about 80% for vinyl in the 2024 national Cost vs. Value data, and the 2025 report put both higher still, at roughly 114% and 97%." Why: The 88%/80% figures are from the 2024 report; the 2025 Cost vs. Value report, already published when this article went up, shows fiber cement at about 114% and vinyl at about 97% per Consumer Reports' summary, so calling 2024 'the most recent' is out of date. Read via search excerpts; conductor should confirm the 2025 figures before publishing. Sources: Consumer Reports Siding Buying Guide (cites 2025 Cost vs. Value); Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared"
Pages: Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared
Was: "You'll receive quotes from pre-screened installers who work with both vinyl and fiber cement" Now: "You'll receive quotes from local installers who work with both vinyl and fiber cement" Why: Editorial rule: contractors must not be described as pre-screened, vetted, licensed or trusted. Sources: Site editorial policy (audit instructions).
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared"
Pages: Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared
Was: "Vinyl melts at relatively low temperatures (around 700°F) and can release toxic fumes, though it doesn't sustain flame on its own" Now: "Vinyl softens and distorts at relatively low temperatures (around 160 to 165°F) and can release toxic fumes when it burns, though it will not ignite from a flame until roughly 730°F and doesn't sustain flame on its own" Why: Vinyl Siding Institute data: normal-grade vinyl siding begins to soften around 160-165°F, ignites from a flame at about 730°F and self-ignites at about 850°F; 700°F is close to the ignition temperature, not a melting point. Sources read via search excerpts only. Sources: Vinyl Siding Institute / Polymeric Exteriors: Siding with Safety (fire performance); Fire Engineering: Reflected Sunlight and Vinyl Siding Distortion.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared"
Pages: Vinyl vs Fiber Cement Siding: Cost, Lifespan, and ROI Compared
Was: "It's been the most popular siding in the U.S. since the mid-1990s." Now: "It was the most popular siding on new U.S. homes for most of the period since the mid-1990s, though stucco held the top spot from 2019 through 2023, and it remains one of the most common claddings on existing homes." Why: Census Survey of Construction data show vinyl led new-home cladding from 1994/95, but NAHB's analysis of 2023 starts found stucco the most common principal siding (26.8%), ahead of vinyl, so the present-tense claim is out of date. Sources read via search excerpts only. Sources: NAHB: Most Common Siding Material for Single-Family Homes (July 2024); Principia: Vinyl siding tops cladding list for 25 years.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Estimate: What to Expect & 5 Questions to Ask"
Pages: Siding Estimate: What to Expect & 5 Questions to Ask
Was: "All 50 states publish contractor license status publicly, and the lookup takes 30 seconds." Now: "Most states license residential contractors at the state level and publish license status online, and the lookup takes 30 seconds; in states with no statewide license, such as Texas, Illinois, and Pennsylvania, check with your city or county building department instead." Why: Several states (Texas, Pennsylvania, New York, Illinois, Kansas, Colorado, Maine, Delaware and others) have no state-level general contractor license, so there is no state lookup there; licensing guides by Thimble and Houzz Pro list these states. Sources were read via search excerpts only. Sources: Thimble: General contractor license requirements by state; Houzz Pro: General Contractor Licensing Requirements by State.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Estimate: What to Expect & 5 Questions to Ask"
Pages: Siding Estimate: What to Expect & 5 Questions to Ask
Was: "That is insurance fraud in all 50 states. It is not a discount or a courtesy" Now: "Waiving or rebating a deductible is illegal under specific statutes in more than half of states (Texas Insurance Code § 707.002, for example), and misrepresenting the deductible to the insurer can be insurance fraud anywhere. It is not a discount or a courtesy" Why: Not every state has made deductible waivers a specific offense; Roofing Contractor reports at least 28 states have such laws (Texas Ins. Code 707.002 via HB 2102, Colorado SB 38), so 'all 50 states' overstates it. Sources were read via search excerpts only; conductor should confirm. Sources: Roofing Contractor: Homeowners Struggle to Pay Insurance Deductibles; Texas Department of Insurance: State law cracks down on roof scams.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does New Siding Cost in 2025? Full Price Guide"
Pages: How Much Does New Siding Cost in 2025? Full Price Guide
Was: "Source: Zonda Media, Cost vs. Value Report 2024. Figures are national averages across all surveyed U.S. regions." Now: "Source: Zonda Media, Cost vs. Value Report 2024. Figures are national averages across all surveyed U.S. regions. The 2025 edition reported higher returns: about 114% for fiber cement on a $21,485 average job and about 96% for vinyl on a $17,950 average job." Why: The 2024 table is a full edition out of date; the 2025 Cost vs. Value report puts fiber cement siding replacement at 113.7% and vinyl at 96.5%, so readers should see the current figures next to the 2024 ones. Sources: James Hardie: How a siding replacement increases home value (cites 2025 Cost vs. Value); The Roofing Brief: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding figures.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does New Siding Cost in 2025? Full Price Guide"
Pages: How Much Does New Siding Cost in 2025? Full Price Guide
Was: "Contractors in our network are pre-screened and carry the licensing and insurance required in your state." Now: "Before you sign, confirm that the contractor carries the licensing and insurance required in your state." Why: The site does not vet or pre-screen contractors or verify their licensing and insurance, so the sentence made an unsupported claim under the site's editorial rules. Sources: Site home page form (editorial rule: contractors are not described as pre-screened; no external fact source).
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does New Siding Cost in 2025? Full Price Guide"
Pages: How Much Does New Siding Cost in 2025? Full Price Guide
Was: "Contractors who specialize in energy upgrades can sometimes help you qualify for utility rebates or federal tax credits for energy-efficient improvements." Now: "Contractors who specialize in energy upgrades can sometimes help you qualify for utility rebates; the federal Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit for insulation ended for improvements placed in service after December 31, 2025." Why: Section 70505 of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (July 2025) terminated the Section 25C Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit for property placed in service after December 31, 2025, so a federal credit is not available for 2026 siding or insulation work. Sources: IRS: Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit; Instead: What section 70505 ended for the 25C home energy credit.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does New Siding Cost in 2025? Full Price Guide"
Pages: How Much Does New Siding Cost in 2025? Full Price Guide
Was: "According to Remodeling magazine's Cost vs. Value report, fiber cement siding replacement consistently returns roughly 70–80% of its cost at resale, making it one of the higher-return exterior renovation projects. Vinyl siding replacement also performs well, typically returning 60–80% of project cost depending on the year and region." Now: "According to the Cost vs. Value report from Zonda, publisher of Remodeling magazine, fiber cement siding replacement returned about 88% of its cost at resale in the 2024 report and roughly 114% in the 2025 report, making it one of the higher-return exterior renovation projects. Vinyl siding replacement also performs well, returning about 80% in 2024 and roughly 96% in 2025, with results varying by year and region." Why: The 70 to 80% and 60 to 80% ranges contradict both the report and the article's own later section: the 2024 report shows 88.4% (fiber cement) and 80.2% (vinyl), and the 2025 report shows 113.7% and 96.5%. Sources: James Hardie: How a siding replacement increases home value (cites 2025 Cost vs. Value); The Roofing Brief: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding figures.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Contractors Minnesota: Costs, Licenses & Tips"
Pages: Siding Contractors Minnesota: Costs, Licenses & Tips
Was: "Any contractor doing work on a home must hold a valid Residential Contractor or Residential Remodeler license." Now: "Under Minn. Stat. 326B.805, a contractor that offers two or more building skills (siding plus roofing, windows, or trim work, for example) must hold a residential building contractor or residential remodeler license; a company that performs only one skill is exempt from licensing, so ask which applies to the firm you are considering." Why: Minnesota's licenses are the residential building contractor and residential remodeler licenses, and Minn. Stat. 326B.805 subd. 6 exempts a specialty contractor who provides only one special skill, so it is not true that every contractor working on a home must be licensed. Sources: Minn. Stat. 326B.805 Licensing requirements; Minnesota DLI: residential building contractor license exemptions.
Corrected a claim in "When to Replace Vinyl Siding: Signs It's Time for New Siding"
Pages: When to Replace Vinyl Siding: Signs It's Time for New Siding
Was: "You'll receive quotes from pre-screened siding professionals in your area—no obligation, no pressure." Now: "You'll receive estimates from local siding contractors in your area, with no obligation and no pressure." Why: The site does not vet or pre-screen contractors, so describing them as pre-screened is an unsupported claim under the site's editorial rules. Sources: Site home page form (editorial rule: contractors are not described as pre-screened; no external fact source).
Corrected a claim in "When to Replace Vinyl Siding: Signs It's Time for New Siding"
Pages: When to Replace Vinyl Siding: Signs It's Time for New Siding
Was: "According to Remodeling Magazine's annual Cost vs. Value report, vinyl siding replacement has historically recouped roughly 68–70% of its cost at resale, though this figure varies by region and market conditions." Now: "According to the annual Cost vs. Value report from Zonda, publisher of Remodeling magazine, vinyl siding replacement recouped roughly 96% of its cost at resale in the 2025 edition and about 80% in 2024; the figure swings from year to year and varies by region and market conditions." Why: The 68 to 70% range dates from the 2021 and 2022 reports; the 2024 report shows 80.2% and the 2025 report 96.5% ($17,313 resale on a $17,950 job), so 'historically 68 to 70%' understates recent returns. Sources: James Hardie: How a siding replacement increases home value (cites 2025 Cost vs. Value); The Roofing Brief: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding figures.
Corrected a claim in "When to Replace Vinyl Siding: Signs It's Time for New Siding"
Pages: When to Replace Vinyl Siding: Signs It's Time for New Siding
Was: "Some vinyl siding brands (such as James Hardie's vinyl lines, CertainTeed, and Alside) offer preferred installer programs." Now: "Some vinyl siding brands (such as CertainTeed, Alside, and Ply Gem) offer preferred installer programs." Why: James Hardie manufactures fiber cement siding and has no vinyl product line (its own filings describe it as a fiber cement company), so it was the wrong example; Ply Gem is a major vinyl brand with an installer program. Sources: James Hardie Industries Form 6-K (fiber cement business description); James Hardie FAQ.
Corrected a claim in "Fiber Cement Siding Cost: Full Price Breakdown for 2025"
Pages: Fiber Cement Siding Cost: Full Price Breakdown for 2025
Was: "It takes about 30 seconds and connects you with pre-screened installers in your area who can provide free on-site estimates." Now: "It takes about 30 seconds and connects you with local installers in your area who can provide free on-site estimates." Why: The site does not vet or pre-screen contractors, so describing installers as pre-screened is an unsupported claim under the site's editorial rules. Sources: Site home page form (editorial rule: contractors are not described as pre-screened; no external fact source).
Corrected a claim in "Fiber Cement Siding Cost: Full Price Breakdown for 2025"
Pages: Fiber Cement Siding Cost: Full Price Breakdown for 2025
Was: "By comparison, the same report shows vinyl siding replacement recovering about 82% of costs." Now: "By comparison, the same report shows vinyl siding replacement recovering about 96% of costs (80% in the 2024 edition)." Why: The 2024 Cost vs. Value vinyl figure was 80.2%, not 82%, and the 2025 report puts vinyl siding replacement at 96.5% ($17,313 resale value on a $17,950 job). Sources: James Hardie: How a siding replacement increases home value (cites 2025 Cost vs. Value); The Roofing Brief: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding figures.
Corrected a claim in "Fiber Cement Siding Cost: Full Price Breakdown for 2025"
Pages: Fiber Cement Siding Cost: Full Price Breakdown for 2025
Was: "According to Remodeling Magazine's 2024 Cost vs. Value report, a fiber cement siding replacement project recoups approximately <strong>88% of its cost</strong> at resale nationally" Now: "According to the 2025 Cost vs. Value report from Zonda, publisher of Remodeling magazine, a fiber cement siding replacement project recoups roughly <strong>114% of its cost</strong> at resale nationally (the 2024 edition put it at 88%)" Why: The 2024 figure (88.4%) has been superseded: the 2025 Cost vs. Value report shows fiber cement siding replacement recouping 113.7% of a $21,485 average job cost nationally, which changes the conclusion rather than just the year. Sources: James Hardie: How a siding replacement increases home value (cites 2025 Cost vs. Value); The Roofing Brief: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding figures.
Corrected a claim in "Fiber Cement Siding Cost: Full Price Breakdown for 2025"
Pages: Fiber Cement Siding Cost: Full Price Breakdown for 2025
Was: "a 12-foot HardiePlank board weighs about 30 pounds" Now: "a 12-foot HardiePlank board weighs roughly 20 to 25 pounds" Why: Retail listings for a 5/16 in. x 8.25 in. x 12 ft HardiePlank board give a weight of about 21 pounds (James Hardie's published density is about 2.3 lb per sq ft), so 30 pounds overstates the board weight. Sources: Sutherlands product listing, HardiePlank 8.25 in x 12 ft; Remodel or Move: How much does a Hardie plank weigh.
Corrected a claim in "Fiber Cement Siding Cost: Full Price Breakdown for 2025"
Pages: Fiber Cement Siding Cost: Full Price Breakdown for 2025
Was: "Other manufacturers include Allura (a CertainTeed brand), Nichiha, and Boral." Now: "Other manufacturers include Allura (made by Elementia's Plycem, which bought CertainTeed's fiber cement siding business in 2013) and Nichiha." Why: Allura is not a CertainTeed brand: CertainTeed sold its fiber cement siding division to Plycem USA, a subsidiary of Elementia, in December 2013 and the product was relaunched as Allura; Boral no longer sells fiber cement siding in the U.S. (its TruExterior line is a poly-ash product, now owned by Westlake Royal), so it is dropped from the list. Sources: retrofit magazine: Mexican consortium acquires CertainTeed's fiber cement division; Siding Solutions: Allura / Plycem bought the CertainTeed fiber cement division.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does Vinyl Siding Cost? Local Price Ranges Explained"
Pages: How Much Does Vinyl Siding Cost? Local Price Ranges Explained
Was: "You'll receive quotes from pre-screened installers in your area, with no obligation." Now: "You'll receive quotes from local installers in your area, with no obligation." Why: The site's How We Screen Contractors page states that contractors receiving requests have not been through its screening checks and that homeowners should verify license and insurance themselves, so 'pre-screened' is an unsupported claim. Sources: Siding Quotes Near Me, How We Screen Contractors.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does Vinyl Siding Cost? Local Price Ranges Explained"
Pages: How Much Does Vinyl Siding Cost? Local Price Ranges Explained
Was: "Vinyl tends to be cheapest where it is most common (the Northeast and Midwest) and where competition among installers is strongest." Now: "Vinyl is easiest to get competitive bids on where it is most common (the Northeast and Midwest), although local labor rates still set the floor, so Northeast prices often run higher than Midwest prices." Why: The sentence contradicted the article's own regional section, which puts the Northeast at the high end ($7-$10 per sq ft); NAHB data supports vinyl's popularity in those regions but labor-rate data shows the Northeast is a high-cost market, not the cheapest. Sources: NAHB, Stucco No Longer Most-Used Exterior Wall Material; Hover, vinyl siding cost by region.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does Vinyl Siding Cost? Local Price Ranges Explained"
Pages: How Much Does Vinyl Siding Cost? Local Price Ranges Explained
Was: "According to data reported by Remodeling Magazine's annual Cost vs. Value report, siding replacement costs can vary by <strong>20% to 35%</strong> between the most and least expensive metro areas in the U.S." Now: "Regional tables in Remodeling Magazine's annual Cost vs. Value report show that siding replacement costs can vary <strong>substantially</strong> between the most and least expensive metro areas in the U.S." Why: The Cost vs. Value report publishes city-level job costs that differ widely, but it does not report a 20-35% spread; the specific figure could not be sourced, so the sentence is softened to what the report supports. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does Vinyl Siding Cost? Local Price Ranges Explained"
Pages: How Much Does Vinyl Siding Cost? Local Price Ranges Explained
Was: "As for return on investment, Remodeling Magazine's 2024 Cost vs. Value report estimates that a vinyl siding replacement recoups approximately <strong>68% to 72% of its cost</strong> at resale nationally, though this varies by market." Now: "As for return on investment, Remodeling Magazine's 2024 Cost vs. Value report estimates that a vinyl siding replacement recoups approximately <strong>80% of its cost</strong> at resale nationally (about $13,957 in added value on a $17,410 job), though this varies by market." Why: The 2024 Cost vs. Value report lists vinyl siding replacement at $17,410 job cost, $13,957 resale value and 80.2% recouped, not 68-72%; the 2025 edition reports an even higher figure (about 97%). Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; Westlake Royal summary of 2025 Cost vs. Value.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does Vinyl Siding Cost? Local Price Ranges Explained"
Pages: How Much Does Vinyl Siding Cost? Local Price Ranges Explained
Was: "According to the U.S. Census Bureau's Survey of Construction, vinyl has been installed on more new single-family homes than any other exterior cladding for decades." Now: "According to the U.S. Census Bureau's Survey of Construction, vinyl has been the most common exterior on new single-family homes in most years, though stucco held the top spot from 2019 through 2023 before vinyl retook it in 2024." Why: NAHB's analysis of Census Survey of Construction data shows stucco was the most-used principal exterior wall material from 2019 to 2023 and vinyl (26%) surpassed it in 2024 for the first time since 2018, so 'for decades' is wrong. Sources: NAHB, Stucco No Longer Most-Used Exterior Wall Material (Oct 2025); NAHB Eye on Housing, Vinyl Surpasses Stucco (Oct 2025); NAHB Eye on Housing, Stucco Remains Most Used (Jul 2024).
Corrected a claim in "How Much Should New Siding Cost? 2024 Price Guide"
Pages: How Much Should New Siding Cost? 2024 Price Guide
Was: "to request free, no-obligation estimates from pre-screened professionals in your area." Now: "to request free, no-obligation estimates from local contractors in your area." Why: The site's How We Screen Contractors page states that contractors receiving requests have not been through its screening checks and that homeowners should verify license and insurance themselves, so 'pre-screened' is an unsupported claim. Sources: Siding Quotes Near Me, How We Screen Contractors.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Should New Siding Cost? 2024 Price Guide"
Pages: How Much Should New Siding Cost? 2024 Price Guide
Was: "<td>Fiber cement siding replacement</td><td>~$20,000</td><td>~66%</td>" Now: "<td>Fiber cement siding replacement</td><td>~$20,600</td><td>~88%</td>" Why: The 2024 report lists fiber cement siding replacement at $20,619 and 88.4% recouped, not 66%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Should New Siding Cost? 2024 Price Guide"
Pages: How Much Should New Siding Cost? 2024 Price Guide
Was: "Fiber cement runs higher—around $20,000—and recoups closer to two-thirds." Now: "Fiber cement runs higher, around $20,600, and recouped about 88%, more than vinyl." Why: The 2024 Cost vs. Value report puts fiber cement siding replacement at $20,619 job cost with 88.4% recouped, above vinyl's 80.2%, so 'closer to two-thirds' is wrong. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Should New Siding Cost? 2024 Price Guide"
Pages: How Much Should New Siding Cost? 2024 Price Guide
Was: "the data consistently shows siding among the higher-ROI exterior projects — second only to a new garage door in many years" Now: "the data consistently shows siding among the higher-ROI exterior projects, usually trailing only a few items such as a new garage door, a steel entry door, and manufactured stone veneer" Why: In the 2024 and 2025 Cost vs. Value reports, garage door replacement, steel entry door replacement and manufactured stone veneer all recoup more than either siding project, so siding is not second only to a garage door. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; Westlake Royal summary of 2025 Cost vs. Value.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Should New Siding Cost? 2024 Price Guide"
Pages: How Much Should New Siding Cost? 2024 Price Guide
Was: "a <strong>vinyl siding replacement</strong> recoups roughly 68%–70% of its cost at resale, while a <strong>fiber cement siding replacement</strong> recoups approximately 70%–73%" Now: "a <strong>vinyl siding replacement</strong> recouped about 80% of its cost at resale in the 2024 report, while a <strong>fiber cement siding replacement</strong> recouped about 88%" Why: The 2024 Cost vs. Value report lists vinyl siding replacement at 80.2% recouped ($17,410 job, $13,957 resale) and fiber cement at 88.4% ($20,619 job, $18,230 resale); the 68-73% figures are from older editions, and the 2025 report is higher still (about 97% and 114%). Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; Westlake Royal summary of 2025 Cost vs. Value.
Corrected a claim in "Cost to Replace Siding on One Side of House (2024)"
Pages: Cost to Replace Siding on One Side of House (2024)
Was: "compare prices from pre-screened siding contractors in your area" Now: "compare prices from local siding contractors in your area" Why: Site editorial policy: contractors must not be described as pre-screened, vetted or licensed. Sources: sidingquotesnearme.com home page (matching form).
Corrected a claim in "Cost to Replace Siding on One Side of House (2024)"
Pages: Cost to Replace Siding on One Side of House (2024)
Was: "Some state insurance regulations — including <a href="https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=1249" rel="nofollow">Illinois' "matching statute" (215 ILCS 5/357.10)</a> — require insurers to provide "reasonably uniform appearance" after a covered loss" Now: "Some states have matching rules, through insurance regulations (Kentucky, Ohio and Nebraska, for example) or court decisions (in Illinois, the 2019 Windridge decision), that require insurers to provide a "reasonably uniform appearance" after a covered loss" Why: 215 ILCS 5/357.10 is an accident and health insurance policy provision, not a property matching statute; Illinois has no matching statute and its matching duty comes from the 7th Circuit's Windridge decision, while the 'reasonably uniform appearance' language appears in state regulations such as Kentucky's, Ohio's and Nebraska's. Sources: United Policyholders matching memo (state citations); Matthiesen, Wickert & Lehrer: Matching Regulations by State; Property Insurance Coverage Law Blog (Windridge, Illinois).
Corrected a claim in "Cost to Replace Siding on One Side of House (2024)"
Pages: Cost to Replace Siding on One Side of House (2024)
Was: "The Vinyl Siding Institute's product certification program permits up to a <strong>4 Delta E unit</strong> shift over the warranty period before a color is considered to have faded excessively" Now: "Manufacturer warranties from CertainTeed and Mastic, for example, allow up to a <strong>4 Hunter (Delta E) unit</strong> shift before a color is considered to have faded excessively" Why: The 4-unit fade threshold is defined in the manufacturers' own warranties (CertainTeed: more than 4 Hunter units, 7 for variegated colors; Mastic: Delta E of 4), not by the VSI product certification program. Sources: CertainTeed Vinyl Siding Lifetime Limited Warranty; Mastic (Ply Gem) Warranty and Care Guide.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered"
Pages: Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered
Was: "<a href="https://www.iii.org/article/understanding-your-insurance-deductibles">The Insurance Information Institute</a> notes that without state-mandated matching, insurers typically pay only for the directly damaged sections" Now: "Without a state matching rule, insurers typically pay only for the directly damaged sections" Why: The cited III deductibles article does not discuss siding matching; the point is supported by insurance-law commentary on matching, so the misattribution is removed. Sources: IRMI: Matching Problem in Property Insurance Claims.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered"
Pages: Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered
Was: "About a dozen states, including <strong>Iowa, Kentucky, Minnesota, and Nebraska</strong>, have "matching" statutes or bulletins requiring insurers to provide a reasonably uniform appearance, per the" Now: "Roughly a dozen states, including <strong>Iowa, Kentucky, Nebraska, and Ohio</strong>, have adopted "matching" regulations or bulletins requiring insurers to provide a reasonably uniform appearance, most of them based on the model claims-settlement regulation of the" Why: Iowa, Kentucky, Nebraska and Ohio have matching regulations derived from the NAIC Unfair Property/Casualty Claims Settlement Practices Model Regulation; Minnesota's rule is case law, and the NAIC does not publish the state list itself, so the attribution was loose. Sources: IRMI: Matching Problem in Property Insurance Claims; Proliferation of Property Insurance Matching Regulations (InsureReinsure); Matching Statutes by State (PropertyCasualty360).
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered"
Pages: Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered
Was: "since switching from ACV to RCV typically adds only 10%–15% to the premium but can dramatically increase your payout" Now: "since replacement cost coverage costs somewhat more than ACV coverage but can dramatically increase your payout" Why: NAIC consumer guidance explains that replacement cost coverage carries a higher premium than ACV but gives no percentage; the 10-15% figure is not supported by the cited source. Sources: NAIC: Actual cash value vs. replacement cost coverage.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered"
Pages: Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered
Was: "<td>NAIC guidance</td>" Now: "<td>Typical adjuster depreciation schedules (estimate)</td>" Why: The NAIC does not publish depreciation percentages for siding; the 50-60% figure is an estimate based on adjuster depreciation schedules and should not be attributed to NAIC guidance. Sources: NAIC: Actual cash value vs. replacement cost coverage.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered"
Pages: Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered
Was: "<td>Fiber cement siding replacement</td><td>$18,000–$24,500</td>" Now: "<td>Fiber cement siding replacement (1,250 sq ft, national average)</td><td>~$20,600</td>" Why: The 2024 Cost vs. Value Report gives a single national average of $20,619 for the fiber cement siding replacement project, not a range. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror).
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered"
Pages: Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered
Was: "<td>Full vinyl siding replacement (2,000 sq ft home)</td><td>$11,500–$21,000</td>" Now: "<td>Vinyl siding replacement (1,250 sq ft, national average)</td><td>~$17,400</td>" Why: The 2024 Cost vs. Value Report gives a single national average of $17,410 for a 1,250 sq ft vinyl siding replacement; it does not publish a range or a 2,000 sq ft figure. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror).
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered"
Pages: Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered
Was: "Some states, like Minnesota and Colorado, have enacted "matching" regulations that require insurers to pay for a reasonable match." Now: "Some states, like Iowa and Kentucky, have adopted "matching" regulations that require insurers to pay for a reasonable match, and Minnesota courts have reached the same result under standard policy language." Why: Iowa (191 Iowa Admin. Code 15.44) and Kentucky (806 KAR 12:095) have matching regulations; Minnesota's matching rule comes from case law rather than an enacted regulation, and no Colorado matching statute or regulation was found. Sources: IRMI: Matching Problem in Property Insurance Claims; Proliferation of Property Insurance Matching Regulations (InsureReinsure); Matching Statutes by State (PropertyCasualty360).
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered"
Pages: Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered
Was: "(often 60–90 days, though this varies by state and policy)" Now: "(most policies simply require "prompt" notice, and some states set hard deadlines, such as one year from the date of loss in Florida under Fla. Stat. 627.70132)" Why: No policy form or statute found sets a 60-90 day window; standard policies require prompt notice, and statutory deadlines where they exist run one year (Florida, section 627.70132) to two years (e.g., Texas), so the original figure was unsupported. Sources: Merlin Law Group: Florida hurricane claim deadlines; GED Lawyers: deadline to file a claim after a storm; Voss Law Firm: Texas time limits for property damage claims.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered"
Pages: Siding Replacement Insurance Coverage: What's Covered
Was: "covers damage to your home's structure — including siding — when the cause is a named peril. Common covered perils include:" Now: "covers damage to your home's structure, including siding, from any cause the policy does not specifically exclude (personal property, by contrast, is covered only for named perils). Commonly covered causes of loss include:" Why: An HO-3 is an open-perils form for the dwelling, covering all causes of loss except those excluded; only contents are on a named-perils basis (HO-2 is the named-perils form), so the original misdescribed how HO-3 dwelling coverage works. Sources: Minnesota Department of Commerce: What is covered; The Zebra: What is an HO-3 policy; Allstate: Types of homeowners insurance policy forms.
Corrected a claim in "Best Time to Replace Siding: A Season-by-Season Guide"
Pages: Best Time to Replace Siding: A Season-by-Season Guide
Was: "we connect you with pre-screened professionals in your area" Now: "we connect you with local siding professionals in your area" Why: Site editorial rule: contractors must not be described as pre-screened. Sources: How We Handle Your Quote Request (this site).
Corrected a claim in "Best Time to Replace Siding: A Season-by-Season Guide"
Pages: Best Time to Replace Siding: A Season-by-Season Guide
Was: "Most acrylic-based tapes adhere down to 25°F; butyl-based tapes typically require 40°F+ unless rated for cold." Now: "Acrylic-based tapes such as ZIP System flashing tape are rated by Huber for application at tape and surface temperatures down to about 20°F; butyl-based tapes typically require 40°F+ unless rated for cold." Why: The row cites Huber ZIP System data, but Huber's tape FAQ sets the limit at a tape temperature of 20°F and its product page cites application as low as 0°F; 25°F is not a figure Huber publishes. Sources: Huber ZIP System Flashing Tape; ZIP System Tape FAQ (installation).
Corrected a claim in "Best Time to Replace Siding: A Season-by-Season Guide"
Pages: Best Time to Replace Siding: A Season-by-Season Guide
Was: "Per <a href="https://www.iccsafe.org/products-and-services/i-codes/2021-i-codes/irc/">IRC Section R703.1.1</a>, siding must be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions" Now: "Per <a href="https://www.iccsafe.org/products-and-services/i-codes/2021-i-codes/irc/">IRC Section R703</a> (for example, Section R703.11.1 for vinyl siding), siding must be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions" Why: IRC R703.1.1 is the 'Water resistance' provision for the exterior wall envelope; the requirement that siding follow manufacturer instructions appears in other parts of Section R703, such as R703.11.1 for vinyl siding, so the section citation was wrong. Sources: 2021 IRC Section R703 Exterior Covering (ICC); IRC R703.1.1 Water Resistance (UpCodes).
Corrected a claim in "7 Siding Replacement Signs: Repair or Full Replace?"
Pages: 7 Siding Replacement Signs: Repair or Full Replace?
Was: "R-values for your climate zone (R-3 to R-5 of continuous exterior insulation in most U.S. zones)" Now: "wall options for your climate zone (under the 2021 IECC, R-5 continuous insulation over R-20 cavity insulation, or R-10 continuous over R-13, in climate zones 4 through 8)" Why: 2021 IECC Table R402.1.3 has no R-3 continuous option; the prescriptive wood-frame wall paths in zones 4-8 are R-30 cavity, R-20 + R-5ci, or R-13 + R-10ci (zone 3: R-20 or R-13 + R-5ci; zones 0-2: R-13 or R-10ci). Code text read via search excerpts of the ICC and RemodelCalculators zone guides. Sources: 2021 IECC Chapter 4 [RE] Residential Energy Efficiency (Table R402.1.3); RemodelCalculators: IECC Climate Zone 6 R-value requirements (2021).
Corrected a claim in "7 Siding Replacement Signs: Repair or Full Replace?"
Pages: 7 Siding Replacement Signs: Repair or Full Replace?
Was: "you'll receive free quotes from pre-screened professionals in your area" Now: "you'll receive free quotes from local professionals in your area" Why: Editorial rule: contractors must not be described as pre-screened, vetted, licensed or trusted. Sources: Site editorial policy (audit instructions).
Corrected a claim in "Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Is the Upgrade Worth It?"
Pages: Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Is the Upgrade Worth It?
Was: "we'll connect you with pre-screened siding pros in your area who can quote both options side by side" Now: "we'll connect you with local siding contractors who can quote both options side by side" Why: Site policy prohibits describing network contractors as pre-screened; the site does not perform that screening. Sources: Site editorial policy: never describe contractors as pre-screened, vetted or licensed.
Corrected a claim in "Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Is the Upgrade Worth It?"
Pages: Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Is the Upgrade Worth It?
Was: "Before finalizing a siding contract, ask the installer to itemize insulation materials separately on the estimate and request the manufacturer's IECC compliance statement. Without that documentation, claiming the credit at tax time becomes difficult." Now: "If your insulation was placed in service in 2025 or earlier and you have not yet filed, ask the installer for an itemized invoice showing the insulation materials separately and request the manufacturer's IECC compliance statement. For work done in 2026 or later, no federal 25C credit applies, though state and utility rebates may still be available." Why: Tells readers to prepare paperwork for a federal credit that ended for property placed in service after December 31, 2025; replacement keeps the documentation advice for eligible 2025 installs and states the current position. (Source page could not be opened from this sandbox: all outbound fetches were blocked; figures come from search-result excerpts of the cited page.) Sources: IRS FAQs on OBBB modifications to sections 25C etc. (credit not allowed for property placed in service after Dec 31, 2025); TurboTax: Energy tax credits, OBBB set end date Dec 31, 2025; Alliance to Save Energy: what the new IRS guidance means.
Corrected a claim in "Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Is the Upgrade Worth It?"
Pages: Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Is the Upgrade Worth It?
Was: "A cleaner path to the credit is installing continuous rigid foam board" Now: "For projects completed by the end of 2025, the cleaner path to the credit was installing continuous rigid foam board" Why: Present-tense advice on how to claim a credit that no longer applies to new work; reframed as past tense for installs placed in service by December 31, 2025. (Source page could not be opened from this sandbox: all outbound fetches were blocked; figures come from search-result excerpts of the cited page.) Sources: IRS FAQs on OBBB modifications to sections 25C etc. (credit not allowed for property placed in service after Dec 31, 2025); TurboTax: Energy tax credits, OBBB set end date Dec 31, 2025; Alliance to Save Energy: what the new IRS guidance means.
Corrected a claim in "Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Is the Upgrade Worth It?"
Pages: Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Is the Upgrade Worth It?
Was: "homeowners can claim <strong>30% of the cost of qualifying insulation materials, up to $1,200 per year</strong>, through 2032" Now: "homeowners could claim <strong>30% of the cost of qualifying insulation materials, up to $1,200 per year</strong>, for property placed in service through December 31, 2025 (the credit had originally been scheduled to run through 2032)" Why: The 'through 2032' end date is out of date: the One Big Beautiful Bill Act moved the 25C termination to property placed in service after December 31, 2025. (Source page could not be opened from this sandbox: all outbound fetches were blocked; figures come from search-result excerpts of the cited page.) Sources: IRS FAQs on OBBB modifications to sections 25C etc. (credit not allowed for property placed in service after Dec 31, 2025); TurboTax: Energy tax credits, OBBB set end date Dec 31, 2025; Alliance to Save Energy: what the new IRS guidance means.
Corrected a claim in "Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Is the Upgrade Worth It?"
Pages: Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Is the Upgrade Worth It?
Was: "Insulated siding itself does not qualify for the federal Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit (Section 25C), but the rigid foam insulation installed behind or as part of siding systems can qualify if it meets IECC requirements. This distinction matters because it can shift the effective payback math by several years." Now: "Insulated siding itself did not qualify for the federal Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit (Section 25C), and the credit ended for any property placed in service after December 31, 2025, under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Public Law 119-21). For projects finished in 2025 or earlier, separately installed rigid foam insulation could qualify if it met IECC requirements, so the distinction still matters to homeowners who have not yet filed for that year." Why: The section presents the 25C credit as currently available; the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (signed July 4, 2025) terminated it for property placed in service after December 31, 2025, so 2026 siding projects cannot claim it. (Source page could not be opened from this sandbox: all outbound fetches were blocked; figures come from search-result excerpts of the cited page.) Sources: IRS FAQs on OBBB modifications to sections 25C etc. (credit not allowed for property placed in service after Dec 31, 2025); TurboTax: Energy tax credits, OBBB set end date Dec 31, 2025; Alliance to Save Energy: what the new IRS guidance means.
Corrected a claim in "Cost to Reside 1500 Sq Ft House: 2024 Ranch Prices"
Pages: Cost to Reside 1500 Sq Ft House: 2024 Ranch Prices
Was: "All contractors in our network are pre-screened for licensing and insurance." Now: "Ask any contractor you are matched with for proof of licensing and insurance before you sign." Why: Site policy prohibits describing network contractors as pre-screened or licensed; the site does not perform that screening, so the sentence makes a claim it cannot support. Sources: Site editorial policy: never describe contractors as pre-screened, vetted or licensed.
Corrected a claim in "Cost to Reside 1500 Sq Ft House: 2024 Ranch Prices"
Pages: Cost to Reside 1500 Sq Ft House: 2024 Ranch Prices
Was: "fiber cement siding replacement has historically recouped around 60–70% of its cost at resale, while vinyl recoups a similar percentage" Now: "fiber cement siding replacement recouped about 88% of its cost at resale in the 2024 Cost vs. Value report and about 114% in the 2025 edition, while vinyl recouped 80% in 2024 and about 97% in 2025" Why: The 60-70% figure is well below what the Cost vs. Value report actually shows: the 2024 edition put fiber cement siding at 88% and vinyl at 80%, and the 2025 edition (Zonda/JLC) put them at 114% and 97%. (Source page could not be opened from this sandbox: all outbound fetches were blocked; figures come from search-result excerpts of the cited page.) Sources: JLC 2025 Cost vs Value Report (siding: vinyl 97%, fiber cement 114%); Zonda 38th annual Cost vs Value press release; Westlake Royal summary of 2025 Cost vs Value (2024 to 2025 fiber cement 88% to 114%).
Corrected a claim in "Tree Branches Siding Damage: How to Prevent Cracks & Rot"
Pages: Tree Branches Siding Damage: How to Prevent Cracks & Rot
Was: "The International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) recommends that no branches overhang the roof or touch the structure." Now: "The International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) lists clearance pruning, removing or reducing limbs so they stay clear of buildings, as a standard pruning objective." Why: ISA and ANSI A300 pruning guidance describe clearance pruning from structures as an objective; no ISA statement that no branch may overhang a roof was found, so the article overstated the recommendation. Sources: ISA Rocky Mountain Chapter, Pruning; Trees Are Good (ISA), Pruning Young Trees.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "NAR 2022 Remodeling Impact Report <h2 id="does-new-siding-help-a-home-sell-faster">" Now: "NAR 2022 Remodeling Impact Report</a> is another source for resale data, but it also reports only on vinyl and fiber cement among siding types.</li> </ul> <h2 id="does-new-siding-help-a-home-sell-faster">" Why: The list item ended mid-sentence with an unclosed link, leaving broken HTML at the end of the section; the sentence is completed and the link, list item and list are closed. Sources: NAR 2022 Remodeling Impact Report.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "We connect you with pre-screened siding professionals in your area" Now: "We connect you with local siding professionals in your area" Why: Site editorial rule: contractors must not be described as pre-screened. Sources: How We Handle Your Quote Request (this site).
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "with whole-house siding generally returning 60–80% and manufactured stone veneer accents recovering near or above 100% in some years" Now: "with whole-house siding returning roughly 80-90% in the 2024 report (and more in 2025) and manufactured stone veneer accents recovering well above 100%" Why: Recent reports put siding at 80.2% (vinyl) and 88.4% (fiber cement) in 2024 and about 97% and 114% in 2025, and stone veneer at 153.2% in 2024; '60-80%' and 'near 100%' are out of date. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "<td>$18,000–$25,000</td><td>~55–65%</td>" Now: "<td>~$21,300</td><td>~67%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: vinyl window replacement costs $21,264 and recoups 67.1%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "<td>$2,200–$2,800</td><td>~75–100%</td>" Now: "<td>~$2,400</td><td>~188%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: steel entry door replacement costs $2,355 and recoups 188.1%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "<td>$15,000–$19,000 (whole house)</td><td>~68%</td>" Now: "<td>~$17,400 (1,250 sq ft)</td><td>~80%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: vinyl siding replacement (1,250 sq ft project) costs $17,410 and recoups 80.2%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "<td>$19,000–$24,000 (whole house)</td><td>~73%</td>" Now: "<td>~$20,600 (1,250 sq ft)</td><td>~88%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: fiber cement siding replacement (1,250 sq ft project) costs $20,619 and recoups 88.4%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "<td>$10,000–$12,000</td><td>~80–90%</td>" Now: "<td>~$11,300</td><td>~153%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: manufactured stone veneer costs $11,287 and recoups 153.2%, as the article's own later section states; 80-90% is wrong. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "<td>$4,000–$5,500</td><td>~100%+</td>" Now: "<td>~$4,500</td><td>~194%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: garage door replacement costs $4,513 and recoups 193.9%, the top project in the report; '~100%+' badly understates it. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "still returns roughly 68%" Now: "still returns roughly 80%" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value national figure for vinyl siding is 80.2%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "At roughly 73% nationally, fiber cement edges out vinyl" Now: "At roughly 88% nationally, fiber cement edges out vinyl" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value national figure for fiber cement siding is 88.4%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "<td>$8–$14</td><td>~73%</td>" Now: "<td>$8–$14</td><td>~88%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: fiber cement siding replacement recoups 88.4%, not 73%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "<td>$4–$9</td><td>~68%</td>" Now: "<td>$4–$9</td><td>~80%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: vinyl siding replacement recoups 80.2%, not 68%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "you can expect to recoup roughly 60–80% of your project cost when you sell. According to Remodeling Magazine's 2024 Cost vs. Value Report, a midrange vinyl siding replacement returns about 68% of the project cost nationally, while fiber cement siding returns around 73%." Now: "you can expect to recoup roughly 80-90% of your project cost when you sell. According to Remodeling Magazine's 2024 Cost vs. Value Report, a midrange vinyl siding replacement returns about 80% of the project cost nationally, while fiber cement siding returns around 88% (the 2025 edition puts them higher still, at roughly 97% and 114%)." Why: The 2024 report figures are 80.2% for vinyl siding and 88.4% for fiber cement, not 68% and 73%; the article's own regional section already quotes the correct numbers, so the lede contradicted it. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type"
Pages: Siding ROI: Resale Value by Material Type
Was: "typically recouping 60 to 80 percent of its cost at resale" Now: "typically recouping 80 percent or more of its cost at resale" Why: The 2024 Cost vs. Value Report shows vinyl siding at 80.2% and fiber cement at 88.4% recouped (the 2025 report is higher still, at roughly 97% and 114%), so 60 to 80 percent understates current data. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Caulk Around Windows & Doors: Stop Water Damage"
Pages: Siding Caulk Around Windows & Doors: Stop Water Damage
Was: "According to the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS), water intrusion through walls is one of the leading causes of structural damage in residential buildings." Now: "According to the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS), water damage is one of the most consistent and ever-present sources of home insurance claims and losses." Why: IBHS's State of the Risk report describes interior water damage as one of the most consistent sources of insurance claims and losses; it does not state that wall water intrusion is a leading cause of structural damage, so the attribution was overstated. Sources: IBHS, State of the Risk: Interior Water Damage.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does It Cost to Reside a Two-Story House? (2025)"
Pages: How Much Does It Cost to Reside a Two-Story House? (2025)
Was: "We connect you with pre-screened siding installers in your area at no cost to you." Now: "We connect you with local siding installers in your area at no cost to you." Why: Site policy prohibits describing network contractors as pre-screened; the site does not perform that screening. Sources: Site editorial policy: never describe contractors as pre-screened, vetted or licensed.
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does It Cost to Reside a Two-Story House? (2025)"
Pages: How Much Does It Cost to Reside a Two-Story House? (2025)
Was: "According to Remodeling Magazine's 2024 Cost vs. Value report, fiber cement siding replacement recoups approximately 86% of its cost at resale nationally, while vinyl siding replacement recoups roughly 82%." Now: "According to the 2025 Cost vs. Value report (published by Zonda, formerly under the Remodeling Magazine name), fiber cement siding replacement recoups roughly 114% of its cost at resale nationally, while vinyl siding replacement recoups roughly 97%; the 2024 edition put them at 88% and 80%." Why: The 2024 figures are misquoted (the report showed 88% fiber cement and 80% vinyl, not 86% and 82%) and a 2025 edition is now out with 114% and 97%. (Source page could not be opened from this sandbox: all outbound fetches were blocked; figures come from search-result excerpts of the cited page.) Sources: JLC 2025 Cost vs Value Report (siding: vinyl 97%, fiber cement 114%); Zonda 38th annual Cost vs Value press release; Westlake Royal summary of 2025 Cost vs Value (2024 to 2025 fiber cement 88% to 114%).
Corrected a claim in "How Much Does It Cost to Reside a Two-Story House? (2025)"
Pages: How Much Does It Cost to Reside a Two-Story House? (2025)
Was: "with the national average landing around $22,000–$28,000 for vinyl siding on a standard 2,000-square-foot home" Now: "with a typical vinyl siding job on a standard 2,000-square-foot home landing around $12,000–$20,000" Why: The $22,000-$28,000 'national average' for vinyl is above every cost guide and above the article's own table ($8,000-$18,000 for 2,000 sq ft of wall): HomeAdvisor gives $7,000-$20,000 for a typical 2,000 sq ft home (average about $12,300) and the 2025 Cost vs Value average vinyl job is just under $18,000. (Source page could not be opened from this sandbox: all outbound fetches were blocked; figures come from search-result excerpts of the cited page.) Sources: HomeAdvisor vinyl siding cost ($7,000-$20,000 for a typical 2,000 sq ft home; avg about $12,300); Angi vinyl siding installation cost; JLC 2025 Cost vs Value (average vinyl siding job nearly $18,000).
Corrected a claim in "Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Cost, Energy Savings & Worth"
Pages: Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Cost, Energy Savings & Worth
Was: "to compare quotes from pre-screened installers in your area who can assess your specific walls" Now: "to compare quotes from local installers in your area who can assess your specific walls" Why: Site policy prohibits describing network contractors as pre-screened; the site does not perform that screening. Sources: Site editorial policy: never describe contractors as pre-screened, vetted or licensed.
Corrected a claim in "Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Cost, Energy Savings & Worth"
Pages: Insulated Siding vs Non-Insulated: Cost, Energy Savings & Worth
Was: "Premium insulated vinyl brands like CertainTeed CedarBoards or Progressa carry higher price tags" Now: "Premium insulated vinyl lines like CertainTeed CedarBoards or Alside Prodigy carry higher price tags" Why: No insulated vinyl siding product called 'Progressa' exists from CertainTeed or any major manufacturer; the well-known premium lines are CertainTeed CedarBoards and Alside Prodigy (about R-5), so the invented name was replaced with a real one. (Source page could not be opened from this sandbox: all outbound fetches were blocked; figures come from search-result excerpts of the cited page.) Sources: CertainTeed CedarBoards insulated siding; Alside Prodigy insulated siding; Progressive Foam: top insulated vinyl siding brands (no Progressa listed).
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?"
Pages: Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?
Was: "You'll receive quotes from pre-screened professionals in your area" Now: "You'll receive quotes from local professionals in your area" Why: Site editorial policy: contractors must not be described as pre-screened, vetted or licensed, and the site does not verify contractor credentials. Sources: sidingquotesnearme.com home page (matching form).
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?"
Pages: Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?
Was: "<td>Lifetime limited</td><td>Included</td><td>Year 5, sliding scale</td><td>Yes, 50-year cap</td></tr>" Now: "<td>Lifetime limited</td><td>Included</td><td>Not prorated</td><td>Yes, same coverage for a subsequent owner</td></tr>" Why: Royal's warranty does not prorate for the original or the subsequent owner, so 'Year 5, sliding scale' and a 50-year cap are not supported by the published warranty. Sources: Royal Double Limited Lifetime Warranty (PDF); Westlake Royal siding warranty page.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?"
Pages: Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?
Was: "<tr><td>Royal Building Products</td><td>Lifetime limited</td><td>Lifetime, prorated</td><td>Yes, one transfer within 10 years</td></tr>" Now: "<tr><td>Royal Building Products</td><td>Lifetime limited, non-prorated</td><td>Lifetime, non-prorated</td><td>Yes, to a subsequent owner with the same coverage</td></tr>" Why: Royal's vinyl siding warranty is a lifetime non-prorated limited warranty that transfers to the next owner without reduced coverage, so 'prorated' and 'one transfer within 10 years' are not supported. Sources: Royal Double Limited Lifetime Warranty (PDF); Westlake Royal siding warranty page.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?"
Pages: Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?
Was: "<td>Lifetime limited</td><td>Lifetime limited</td><td>Year 10 (declining schedule)</td><td>Yes, 50 years for 2nd owner</td></tr>" Now: "<td>Lifetime limited</td><td>Lifetime limited</td><td>After year 5 for a second owner (declining schedule)</td><td>Yes, 50 years for 2nd owner</td></tr>" Why: Mastic's published coverage schedule for subsequent owners is 100% through year 5, then 90%, 80% and declining, so proration begins after year 5 rather than year 10. Sources: Mastic (Ply Gem) Warranty and Care Guide.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?"
Pages: Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?
Was: "Most warranties only cover fade beyond 4 Delta E units on light colors and 5 on dark colors, per <a href="https://www.vinylsiding.org/certification/">Vinyl Siding Institute (VSI)</a> certification standards." Now: "Most warranties only cover fade beyond about 4 Hunter (Delta E) units for solid colors, with a higher threshold (CertainTeed uses 7) for variegated colors; the limit is set in each manufacturer's warranty, not by <a href="https://www.vinylsiding.org/certification/">Vinyl Siding Institute (VSI)</a> certification." Why: Fade thresholds come from the manufacturer warranties (CertainTeed: more than 4 Hunter units, 7 for variegated; Mastic: Delta E of 4), and no source supports a 5-unit dark-color figure or attributes the threshold to VSI certification. Sources: CertainTeed Vinyl Siding Lifetime Limited Warranty; Mastic (Ply Gem) Warranty and Care Guide.
Corrected a claim in "Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?"
Pages: Vinyl Siding Lifespan: How Long Does It Really Last?
Was: "roughly 5/8 of an inch over a 12-foot panel, according to the Vinyl Siding Institute" Now: "roughly 1/2 inch or more over a 12-foot panel, according to the Vinyl Siding Institute" Why: The VSI installation manual states vinyl siding can expand and contract 1/2 inch (12.7 mm) or more over a 12 ft 6 in length, not 5/8 inch. Sources: VSI Vinyl Siding Installation Manual (2022).
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "We connect you with pre-screened siding professionals who can assess your home" Now: "We connect you with local siding professionals who can assess your home" Why: Site editorial rule: contractors must not be described as pre-screened. Sources: How We Handle Your Quote Request (this site).
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "<a href="https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes472181.htm">Bureau of Labor Statistics</a> reports median wages for construction laborers range from under $19/hour in parts of the South to over $34/hour in the Pacific region" Now: "<a href="https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes472061.htm">Bureau of Labor Statistics</a> reports median wages for construction laborers range from under $19/hour in several Southern states to roughly $30/hour or more in the highest-paying states, such as Illinois, Hawaii and Washington" Why: The linked OES page (47-2181) is for roofers; construction laborers are occupation 47-2061, whose state medians top out around $30-$33/hour rather than 'over $34 in the Pacific region'. Sources: BLS OES 47-2061 Construction Laborers; BLS OES 47-2181 Roofers.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "<td><strong>~64%</strong></td><td><strong>~68%</strong></td>" Now: "<td><strong>~88%</strong></td><td><strong>~80%</strong></td>" Why: National 2024 Cost vs. Value figures are 88.4% for fiber cement and 80.2% for vinyl; the regional rows above this line could not be verified and should be re-derived from the report's regional pages. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "<td>Asphalt roof replacement</td><td>~61%</td>" Now: "<td>Asphalt roof replacement</td><td>~57%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: asphalt shingle roofing replacement recoups 56.9%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "<td>Wood deck addition</td><td>~65%</td>" Now: "<td>Wood deck addition</td><td>~83%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: wood deck addition recoups 82.9%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "<td>Fiber cement siding replacement</td><td>~64%</td>" Now: "<td>Fiber cement siding replacement</td><td>~88%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: fiber cement siding replacement recoups 88.4%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "<td>Vinyl siding replacement</td><td>~68%</td>" Now: "<td>Vinyl siding replacement</td><td>~80%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: vinyl siding replacement recoups 80.2%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "<td>Manufactured stone veneer (partial)</td><td>~105%</td>" Now: "<td>Manufactured stone veneer (partial)</td><td>~153%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: manufactured stone veneer recoups 153.2%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "<td>Garage door replacement</td><td>~94%</td>" Now: "<td>Garage door replacement</td><td>~194%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: garage door replacement recoups 193.9%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "since you're recovering roughly two-thirds of the cost, not 100%" Now: "since you're typically recovering 80-90% of the cost, not 100%" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value puts siding recovery at 80.2% (vinyl) and 88.4% (fiber cement); 'two-thirds' reflects older editions. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "and returns about 64% at resale. While the percentage is slightly lower than vinyl, the absolute dollar amount recouped is higher because" Now: "and returns about 88% at resale. The percentage is higher than vinyl's, and the absolute dollar amount recouped is higher too, because" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: fiber cement recoups 88.4% versus 80.2% for vinyl, so fiber cement is higher on both percentage and dollars; the original had the ranking backwards. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "Its ROI hovers around 68% nationally." Now: "Its ROI was about 80% nationally in the 2024 report." Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value national figure for vinyl siding is 80.2%. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "<td>~$10,600</td><td>~$11,200</td><td>~105%</td>" Now: "<td>~$11,300</td><td>~$17,300</td><td>~153%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: manufactured stone veneer costs $11,287, adds $17,291 at resale, 153.2% recouped. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "<td>~$19,600</td><td>~$12,500</td><td>~64%</td>" Now: "<td>~$20,600</td><td>~$18,200</td><td>~88%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: fiber cement siding replacement costs $20,619, adds $18,230 at resale, 88.4% recouped. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "<td>~$16,300</td><td>~$11,100</td><td>~68%</td>" Now: "<td>~$17,400</td><td>~$14,000</td><td>~80%</td>" Why: 2024 Cost vs. Value: vinyl siding replacement costs $17,410, adds $13,957 at resale, 80.2% recouped. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material"
Pages: Siding ROI 2025: Resale Value by Material
Was: "a midrange vinyl siding replacement recoups roughly 68% of its cost nationally, while fiber cement siding returns about 64%" Now: "a midrange vinyl siding replacement recoups roughly 80% of its cost nationally, while fiber cement siding returns about 88% (the 2025 edition puts them higher still, at roughly 97% and 114%)" Why: The 2024 Cost vs. Value Report shows vinyl siding at 80.2% and fiber cement at 88.4%, so both figures were wrong and the ranking was reversed. Sources: Remodeling 2024 Cost vs. Value Report; 2024 Cost vs. Value Report (PDF mirror); Westlake Royal: 2025 Cost vs. Value siding ROI.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices"
Pages: Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices
Was: "the <a href="https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/insulation">U.S. Department of Energy</a> estimates homeowners can cut heating and cooling costs by about 15% by sealing and insulating the building envelope." Now: "the <a href="https://www.energystar.gov/saveathome/seal_insulate/methodology">EPA's ENERGY STAR program</a> estimates homeowners can cut heating and cooling costs by an average of 15% by sealing and insulating the building envelope." Why: The 15% heating-and-cooling (11% total energy) savings estimate comes from EPA ENERGY STAR's Seal and Insulate methodology, not from DOE's Energy Saver insulation page; the site's own warning-signs article attributes it correctly. Page could not be opened in this session; figure is widely cited from ENERGY STAR. Sources: ENERGY STAR: Seal and Insulate methodology.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices"
Pages: Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices
Was: "insures unsecured loans up to $25,000 for single-family home improvements, with terms up to 20 years — useful if you don't have equity built up." Now: "insures property improvement loans up to $25,000 for single-family homes, with terms up to 20 years; loans over $7,500 must be secured by a lien on the home, but no equity is required, so it is useful if you don't have equity built up." Why: Under HUD's Title I rules (24 CFR Part 201) only loans of $7,500 or less may be unsecured; larger loans up to the $25,000 single-family cap must be secured by a mortgage or deed of trust. Sources read via search excerpts only. Sources: 24 CFR 201.10 Loan amounts and terms (Cornell LII); HUD: Title I Property Improvement Loans.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices"
Pages: Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices
Was: "Average HELOC rate was <strong>8.27%</strong> as of October 2025 per <a href="https://www.bankrate.com/home-equity/home-equity-loan-rates/">Bankrate's national survey</a>. On a $20,000 balance over 10 years," Now: "Average home equity loan rate was <strong>about 8.3%</strong> (HELOCs averaged closer to 7.8%) as of October 2025 per <a href="https://www.bankrate.com/home-equity/home-equity-loan-rates/">Bankrate's national survey</a>. On a $20,000 fixed-rate balance over 10 years," Why: Bankrate data reported by CBS News put the average HELOC at about 7.84% in October 2025, not 8.27%; the 8.27% figure and the linked page correspond to fixed home equity loan rates, and the 10-year payment math only works for a fixed loan. Sources read via search excerpts only. Sources: CBS News: What's a good HELOC rate now (October 2025, citing Bankrate); Bankrate: Current home equity loan rates.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices"
Pages: Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices
Was: "Fiber cement ranked among the top five projects nationally for cost recovery in 2024." Now: "Fiber cement ranked sixth of the 23 projects tracked nationally for cost recovery in 2024." Why: In the 2024 Cost vs. Value report fiber cement siding (88.4%) sat behind garage door, steel entry door, manufactured stone veneer, fiberglass grand entrance and minor kitchen remodel; Consumer Reports' summary of the 2025 report says only four projects beat fiber cement (about 114%). Sources read via search excerpts only; conductor should confirm rank. Sources: HomesMSP: Cost vs Value 2024 rankings; Consumer Reports Siding Buying Guide (2025 Cost vs. Value).
Corrected a claim in "Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices"
Pages: Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices
Was: "we'll send you quotes from pre-screened pros in your area" Now: "we'll send you quotes from local pros in your area" Why: Editorial rule: contractors must not be described as pre-screened, vetted, licensed or trusted. Sources: Site editorial policy (audit instructions).
Corrected a claim in "Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices"
Pages: Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices
Was: "Here are realistic full-project quotes we've seen this year:" Now: "Here are realistic full-project estimates for 2025, built from the ranges above:" Why: Same issue: the figures are illustrative estimates, not quotes the site has seen. Sources: Angi: Cost to replace vinyl and fiber cement siding.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices"
Pages: Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices
Was: "Sample Real-World Quotes for 2,000 Sq Ft Homes (2025)" Now: "Sample Project Estimates for 2,000 Sq Ft Homes (2025)" Why: Heading presents illustrative figures as collected quotes; the site has no quote data, so they must be labeled estimates. Sources: Angi: Cost to replace vinyl and fiber cement siding.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices"
Pages: Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices
Was: "These are installed prices — material plus labor — based on quotes we've seen across the U.S. in early 2025." Now: "These are installed prices, material plus labor, based on typical national cost-guide ranges for 2025." Why: The site does not collect quotes or survey data; editorial policy requires cost figures to be described as typical ranges or estimates, and the ranges match published cost guides. Sources: Angi: Cost to replace vinyl and fiber cement siding.
Corrected a claim in "Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices"
Pages: Siding Cost 2000 Sq Ft House: 2025 Installed Prices
Was: "A single-story ranch with the same floor area has more roof and foundation footprint, so it often needs <strong>2,200 to 2,800 sq ft</strong> of siding because the walls spread out more." Now: "A single-story ranch with the same floor area has a bigger footprint but only one story of wall height, so it usually needs somewhat less siding, often <strong>1,500 to 2,000 sq ft</strong> after subtracting openings." Why: Wall area equals perimeter times height; for equal floor area a ranch has roughly 1.4x the perimeter but half the wall height, so it needs about 30% less siding than a two-story, not more. Worked examples put a one-story 2,000 sq ft home at about 1,800-2,000 sq ft of gross wall area versus 2,000-2,900 sq ft of siding for a two-story. Sources read via search excerpts only. Sources: Coohom: Calculating siding for a 2,000 sq ft two-story home; 614 Exteriors: How much does 2,000 sq ft of siding cost.
Corrected a claim in "James Hardie vs LP SmartSide: An Honest Comparison"
Pages: James Hardie vs LP SmartSide: An Honest Comparison
Was: "You'll receive quotes from pre-screened installers who are experienced with both products" Now: "You'll receive quotes from local installers who are experienced with both products" Why: Site editorial rule: contractors must not be described as pre-screened; the site does not screen contractors. Sources: How We Handle Your Quote Request (this site).
Corrected a claim in "James Hardie vs LP SmartSide: An Honest Comparison"
Pages: James Hardie vs LP SmartSide: An Honest Comparison
Was: "LP also has an <strong>Preferred Installer</strong> network, though it's smaller than Hardie's." Now: "LP also runs the <strong>BuildSmart Preferred Contractor</strong> program, though its network is smaller than Hardie's." Why: LP's installer program is called the LP BuildSmart Preferred Contractor Program (with Pro, Expert and Master levels); 'Preferred Installer network' is not LP's name for it. Sources: LP BuildSmart Preferred Contractor Program (LP SmartSide blog).
Brand pages: product lineups, warranty terms, ownership, and ratings corrected
Pages: Alside, CertainTeed, James Hardie, LP SmartSide, Mastic, Royal Building Products
A site-wide fact audit checked brand pages against statutes, agency sites, manufacturer documentation, and storm records and made 62 corrections across 6 pages. Examples: Royal Building Products (Royal's warranty does not prorate and extends full coverage to the second owner, unlike the front-window-then-prorated structure described); CertainTeed (CertainTeed no longer makes fiber cement siding; WeatherBoards was discontinued and the rights sold to Allura); Alside (Alside is owned by Associated Materials (Strategic Value Partners since 2022), not Cornerstone Building Brands); Mastic (Quest is Mastic's thickest standard panel (.046 in), not its economy line); James Hardie (James Hardie has retired the Aspyre Collection name; the Artisan profiles and panel textures now sell under the Hardie Architectural Collection); LP SmartSide (LP states its lap and panel siding are Class C and do not meet Class A). Each page's reviewed date was updated. Claims that could not be verified from a source were left unchanged and are re-checked on the next monthly sweep.
State guides: statute sections, license rules, insurance minimums, and storm facts corrected
Pages: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming
A site-wide fact audit checked state pages against statutes, agency sites, manufacturer documentation, and storm records and made 332 corrections across 39 pages. Examples: West Virginia (Act recodified to Chapter 30, Article 42); Idaho (General ICPA claims do not carry treble damages); California (§2071 sets a 12-month suit limitation, extended to 24 months only for state-of-emergency losses; the page stated a flat two-year rule); Kansas (The Kansas deductible-rebate ban (K.S.A. 50-6,125) is limited to residential roofing contractors; it does not reach siding by its text); Arkansas (The seven-year ACV endorsement comes from Arkansas Insurance Department Bulletin 17-2023 and applies to wind/hail damage to roofs, not to siding or exterior surfacing generally; prior AID practice allowed optional endorsements at 10 years and mandatory ones at 15); North Dakota (The Enderlin tornado occurred June 20, 2025 (not June 27) and was upgraded to EF5 in October 2025). Each page's reviewed date was updated. Claims that could not be verified from a source were left unchanged and are re-checked on the next monthly sweep.
City guides: permit offices, license classes, local districts, and storm dates corrected
Pages: Birmingham, Alabama, Montgomery, Alabama, Anchorage, Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, Phoenix, Arizona, Fort Smith, Arkansas, Anaheim, California, Bakersfield, California, Fresno, California, Los Angeles, California, Riverside, California, Sacramento, California, San Diego, California, San Francisco, California, San Jose, California, Aurora, Colorado, Denver, Colorado, Lakewood, Colorado, Miami, Florida, Tampa, Florida, Athens, Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, Columbus, Georgia, Nampa, Idaho, Springfield, Illinois, Fort Wayne, Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana, South Bend, Indiana, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Davenport, Iowa, Des Moines, Iowa, Overland Park, Kansas, Wichita, Kansas, Bowling Green, Kentucky, Louisville, Kentucky, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana, New Orleans, Louisiana, Baltimore, Maryland, and 42 more
A site-wide fact audit checked city pages against statutes, agency sites, manufacturer documentation, and storm records and made 318 corrections across 82 pages. Examples: Portland, Oregon (Portland Permitting & Development replaced the Bureau of Development Services on July 1, 2024); Fairbanks, Alaska (The borough has no building code and issues no building permits; the two cities do); Las Vegas, Nevada (Coverage of the July 1, 2025 storm reported roughly 30,000-plus NV Energy customers without power at peak, not 300,000); Overland Park, Kansas (Overland Park does not issue contractor licenses; the Johnson County Contractor Licensing program does); Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (Oklahoma's CIB does not license or register siding contractors; OKC requires city contractor registration to pull permits); Memphis, Tennessee (The record MLGW outage was July 22, 2003 (Hurricane Elvis), not 2023). Each page's reviewed date was updated. Claims that could not be verified from a source were left unchanged and are re-checked on the next monthly sweep.
Roofing-only consumer statutes were described as covering siding
Pages: Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Minnesota, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, South Carolina, Colorado
Several state guides described a deductible-waiver ban, a contract-cancellation right, or a claim-negotiation limit as applying to siding contracts. We re-read each statute's title and definitions: Florida §489.147, Georgia §10-1-393.12, Kentucky KRS 367.622–628, Minnesota §326B.811, Mississippi §§75-24-301–317, Oklahoma 59 O.S. §1151, South Dakota §58-33-66/67, Tennessee §62-6-601, South Carolina §40-59-25, and Colorado SB 12-038 are each scoped to roofing contractors or roof systems. The guides now attribute those protections to roofing work and explain that a stand-alone siding contract falls under the state's general consumer-protection law instead. In South Carolina the deductible-waiver citation was also corrected from subsection (B) to (E).
Removed an unverifiable insurer-discount claim
Pages: Articles
An article named five insurers as offering 5–25% premium discounts for impact-resistant siding. That range is documented for Class 4 impact-resistant roofing, not siding, and no source confirmed carrier-specific siding discount programs at those figures. The passage now tells homeowners to ask their carrier whether any siding-related credit exists, without implying a number.
Reversed resale-value figures in a fiber cement vs. vinyl comparison
Pages: Articles
A comparison table stated fiber cement recoups "closer to two-thirds" of its cost at resale versus 80% for vinyl. The Remodeling Cost vs. Value data it referred to shows fiber cement recouping as much as or more than vinyl. The table now uses directional language and links the report directly rather than stating a fixed percentage that shifts year to year. In the same pass, an ASTM C518 R-value claim gained its missing citation and a "$1 million liability insurance" figure was reworded as a common minimum, not a legal requirement.
Homepage overstated the number of metro guides
Pages: Home
The homepage said "50 states + 40 metros live now." The site had over 200 city guides at the time. The line now reads "200+ city guides" so the homepage does not state a precise number it cannot back up.
Trust claims brought in line with how leads are actually handled
Pages: Home, Editorial standards, How we screen contractors
A site-wide review found the homepage, the how-it-works section, and the quote-form confirmation promising "trusted," "licensed" contractors, side-by-side bid comparison, and contact "within an hour." None of those are things we control. The editorial-standards page also said every draft was reviewed by a human editor before publishing, when in fact automated checks ran first and a person reviewed only drafts that failed them. All of that copy was rewritten to describe the real process. The same review found the quote form's consent checkbox was not being recorded server-side; it is now stored with every request.